Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18458002›Full record

ReviewDNA repair2008

Mouse models of DNA double-strand break repair and neurological disease.

Pierre-Olivier Frappart, Peter J McKinnon

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in DNA repair, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 48 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Suppressor mutations inGenome research · 2020
    Article
  13. Article
  14. RINT1 Loss Impairs Retinogenesis Through TRP53-Mediated Apoptosis.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2020
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Pierre-Olivier FrappartDepartment Genetics and Tumor Cell Biology, St Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, TN 38105, USA.
Peter J McKinnon
St. Jude Children's Research Hospital · US

Funding

ATM and DNA Damage in the Nervous SystemR01NS037956 · NINDS · ST. JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL · PI MCKINNON, PETER J · 1998 to 2022
$7.6M
NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS037956
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The repair of DNA damage is essential for the prevention of disease. The DNA double-strand break (DSB) is a particularly hazardous lesion. DNA DSBs activate a coordinated cellular response involving cell cycle checkpoint activation and repair of the DNA break, or alternatively apoptosis. In the nervous system the inability to respond to DNA DSBs may lead to neurodegenerative disease or brain tumors. Therefore, understanding the DNA DSB response mechanism in the nervous system is of high importance for developing new treatments for neurodegeneration and cancer. In this regard, the use of mouse models represents an important approach for advancing our understanding of the biology of the DNA damage response in the nervous system.

Indexed as

DNA Breaks, Double-StrandedDNA RepairMiceModels, AnimalAnimalsDisease Models, AnimalDNAHumansModels, BiologicalNeurodegenerative DiseasesDNA

Identifiers

PMID18458002
PMCPMC3831504
OpenAlexW2040503252

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.