ArticleBMC structural biology2008
Improving the accuracy of template-based predictions by mixing and matching between initial models.
Article in BMC structural biology, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Exploring Polypharmacology in Drug Discovery and Repurposing Using the CANDO Platform.Current pharmaceutical design · 2016Review
- From local structure to a global framework: recognition of protein folds.Journal of the Royal Society, Interface · 2014Review
- Bhageerath-H: a homology/ab initio hybrid server for predicting tertiary structures of monomeric soluble proteins.BMC bioinformatics · 2014Article
- patGPCR: a multitemplate approach for improving 3D structure prediction of transmembrane helices of G-protein-coupled receptors.Computational and mathematical methods in medicine · 2013Article
- Effect of using suboptimal alignments in template-based protein structure prediction.Proteins · 2011Article
- Q-Dock(LHM): Low-resolution refinement for ligand comparative modeling.Journal of computational chemistry · 2010Article
- Protein structure prediction and model quality assessment.Drug discovery today · 2009Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundComparative modeling is a technique to predict the three dimensional structure of a given protein sequence based primarily on its alignment to one or more proteins with experimentally determined structures. A major bottleneck of current comparative modeling methods is the lack of methods to accurately refine a starting initial model so that it approaches the resolution of the corresponding experimental structure. We investigate the effectiveness of a graph-theoretic clique finding approach to solve this problem.
resultsOur method takes into account the information presented in multiple templates/alignments at the three-dimensional level by mixing and matching regions between different initial comparative models. This method enables us to obtain an optimized conformation ensemble representing the best combination of secondary structures, resulting in the refined models of higher quality. In addition, the process of mixing and matching accumulates near-native conformations, resulting in discriminating the native-like conformation in a more effective manner. In the seventh Critical Assessment of Structure Prediction (CASP7) experiment, the refined models produced are more accurate than the starting initial models.
conclusionThis novel approach can be applied without any manual intervention to improve the quality of comparative predictions where multiple template/alignment combinations are available for modeling, producing conformational models of higher quality than the starting initial predictions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.