Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18457595›Full record

ArticleBMC developmental biology2008

Age- and calorie-independent life span extension from dietary restriction by bacterial deprivation in Caenorhabditis elegans.

Erica D Smith, Tammi L Kaeberlein, Brynn T Lydum, Jennifer Sager, K Linnea Welton, Brian K Kennedy, Matt Kaeberlein

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC developmental biology, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 87 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
87citing papers in PubMed
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

87 citing papers in PubMed, 134 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. A simplified intermittent fasting regimen robustly extendsbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Rewarding touch limits lifespan through neural to intestinal signaling.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. C22 disrupts embryogenesis and extendsFrontiers in physiology · 2023
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Fitness benefits of dietary restriction.Proceedings. Biological sciences · 2021
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

27 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Erica D SmithDepartment of Pathology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195, USA. ericas4@u.washington.edu
Tammi L Kaeberlein
Brynn T Lydum
Jennifer Sager
K Linnea Welton
Brian K Kennedy
Matt Kaeberlein
Seattle University · USUniversity of Washington · USUniversity of Washington Applied Physics Laboratory · US

Funding

University of Washington Nathan Shock Center of Excellence in the Basic Biology of AgingP30AG013280 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI Su-In Lee · 1995 to 2026
$27.1M
NIA NIH HHS P30 AG013280
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDietary restriction (DR) increases life span and delays age-associated disease in many organisms. The mechanism by which DR enhances longevity is not well understood.

resultsUsing bacterial food deprivation as a means of DR in C. elegans, we show that transient DR confers long-term benefits including stress resistance and increased longevity. Consistent with studies in the fruit fly and in mice, we demonstrate that DR also enhances survival when initiated late in life. DR by bacterial food deprivation significantly increases life span in worms when initiated as late as 24 days of adulthood, an age at which greater than 50% of the cohort have died. These survival benefits are, at least partially, independent of food consumption, as control fed animals are no longer consuming bacterial food at this advanced age. Animals separated from the bacterial lawn by a barrier of solid agar have a life span intermediate between control fed and food restricted animals. Thus, we find that life span extension from bacterial deprivation can be partially suppressed by a diffusible component of the bacterial food source, suggesting a calorie-independent mechanism for life span extension by dietary restriction.

conclusionBased on these findings, we propose that dietary restriction by bacterial deprivation increases longevity in C. elegans by a combination of reduced food consumption and decreased food sensing.

Indexed as

BacteriaCaloric RestrictionAnimalsCaenorhabditis elegansCulture Media, ConditionedFood DeprivationFood MicrobiologyLongevityCulture Media, Conditioned

Identifiers

PMID18457595
PMCPMC2408926
OpenAlexW2008371754

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.