Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18456848›Full record

ArticleApplied and environmental microbiology2008

In silico and in vivo evaluation of bacteriophage phiEF24C, a candidate for treatment of Enterococcus faecalis infections.

Jumpei Uchiyama, Mohammad Rashel, Iyo Takemura, Hiroshi Wakiguchi, Shigenobu Matsuzaki

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Applied and environmental microbiology, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 37 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
37citing papers in PubMed
6.2field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

37 citing papers in PubMed, 75 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Insights into ecology, pathogenesis, and biofilm formation ofMicrobiology and molecular biology reviews : MMBR · 2025
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. The applications of animal models in phage therapy: An update.Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics · 2023
    Review
  6. Enterococcal Phages: Food and Health Applications.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Animal Models of Phage Therapy.Frontiers in microbiology · 2021
    Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jumpei UchiyamaDepartment of Microbiology and Infection, Kochi Medical School, Kohasu Oko-cho, Nankoku City, Kochi 783-8505, Japan.
Mohammad Rashel
Iyo Takemura
Hiroshi Wakiguchi
Shigenobu Matsuzaki
Kōchi University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Along with the increasing threat of nosocomial infections by vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecalis, bacteriophage (phage) therapy has been expected as an alternative therapy against infectious disease. Although genome information and proof of applicability are prerequisites for a modern therapeutic phage, E. faecalis phage has not been analyzed in terms of these aspects. Previously, we reported a novel virulent phage, phiEF24C, and its biology indicated its therapeutic potential against E. faecalis infection. In this study, the phiEF24C genome was analyzed and the in vivo therapeutic applicability of phiEF24C was also briefly assessed. Its complete genome (142,072 bp) was predicted to have 221 open reading frames (ORFs) and five tRNA genes. In our functional analysis of the ORFs by use of a public database, no proteins undesirable in phage therapy, such as pathogenic and integration-related proteins, were predicted. The noncompetitive directions of replication and transcription and the host-adapted translation of the phage were deduced bioinformatically. Its genomic features indicated that phiEF24C is a member of the SPO1-like phage genus and especially that it has a close relationship to the Listeria phage P100, which is authorized for prophylactic use. Thus, these bioinformatics analyses rationalized the therapeutic eligibility of phiEF24C. Moreover, the in vivo therapeutic potential of phiEF24C, which was effective at a low concentration and was not affected by host sensitivity to the phage, was proven by use of sepsis BALB/c mouse models. Furthermore, no change in mouse lethality was observed under either single or repeated phage exposures. Although further study is required, phiEF24C can be a promising therapeutic phage against E. faecalis infections.

Indexed as

AnimalsBacteriophagesDisease Models, AnimalEnterococcus faecalisFemaleGenome, ViralGram-Positive Bacterial InfectionsMiceMice, Inbred BALB CMolecular Sequence DataSepsisSequence Analysis, DNATreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID18456848
PMCPMC2446516
OpenAlexW2114088571

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.