Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18455628›Full record

ArticleUrology2008

Does the level of prostate cancer risk affect cancer prevention with finasteride?

Ian M Thompson, Catherine M Tangen, Howard L Parnes, Scott M Lippman, Charles A Coltman

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Urology, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.0field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Screening for prostate cancer.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2013
    Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. The implementation of screening for prostate cancer.Prostate cancer and prostatic diseases · 2010
    Review
  7. Finasteride to prevent prostate cancer: should all men or only a high-risk subgroup be treated?Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology · 2010
    Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Ian M ThompsonDepartment of Urology, University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, Texas 78229, USA. thompsoni@uthscsa.edu
Catherine M Tangen
Howard L Parnes
Scott M Lippman
Charles A Coltman
Fred Hutch Cancer Center · USNational Cancer Institute · USSWOG Cancer Research Network · USThe University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio · USThe University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center · US

Funding

SWOG Foreign AccrualsU10CA037429 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HLTH SCIENCE CENTER · PI BLANKE, CHARLES D., MEYSKENS, FRANK L. · 1985 to 2014
$205.2M
NCI NIH HHS U10 CA037429
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesFinasteride reduced the risk of prostate cancer by 24.8% in the Prostate Cancer Prevention Trial (PCPT). Whether this represents treatment or prevention and who is most likely to benefit are unknown. We sought to clarify these issues by this investigation.

methodsWe fit a logistic regression model to men in the placebo group of the PCPT using risk factors for prostate cancer at entry to predict prostate cancer during the subsequent 7 years of study. Men in the two treatment groups were categorized into quintiles of risk of prostate cancer based on the predictive logistic model. A second model was fit evaluating finasteride's effect on prostate cancer for each subgroup defined by quartiles of baseline prostate-specific antigen (PSA) . The magnitude of the prevention effect of finasteride on prostate cancer was then evaluated across risk and PSA strata.

resultsFinasteride significantly reduced prostate cancer risk for all risk quintiles. For quintiles 1 through 5, odds ratios were 0.72, 0.52, 0.64, 0.66, and 0.71, respectively (all P < or = 0.05). For quartiles of risk of entry PSA (less than 0.7 ng/mL, 0.7 to 1.1 ng/mL, 1.1 to 1.7 ng/mL, and 1.8 to 3.0 ng/mL), odds ratios increased (smaller treatment effect) as PSA increased: 0.60, 0.62, 0.66, and 0.69, respectively, but remained significant for all strata (each P < 0.001).

conclusionsFinasteride significantly reduced prostate cancer risk regardless of the level of this risk, estimated either by multivariable risk or by PSA stratum; this suggests that finasteride exerts both treatment and preventive effects. All men undergoing PSA screening should be informed of the potential for finasteride to reduce their risk of prostate cancer.

Indexed as

Enzyme InhibitorsFinasterideHumansMaleMiddle AgedProstatic NeoplasmsRisk AssessmentRisk FactorsEnzyme InhibitorsFinasteride

Identifiers

PMID18455628
PMCPMC2692669
OpenAlexW2024327408

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.