Trial reportJournal of the neurological sciences2008
Blood pressure declines and less favorable outcomes in the NINDS tPA stroke study.
Trial report in Journal of the neurological sciences, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 23 citations in OpenAlex.
- Thrombolysis for acute ischaemic stroke.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2014Pooled it
- Blood Pressure Management in Acute Ischemic Stroke.Current hypertension reports · 2020Review
- Blood Pressure Management Following Large Vessel Occlusion Strokes: A Narrative ReviewBalkan medical journal · 2020Review
- Management of Blood Pressure During and After Recanalization Therapy for Acute Ischemic Stroke.Frontiers in neurology · 2019Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
background and purposeHypertension is the most important modifiable risk factor for secondary stroke prevention but the immediate management of blood pressure after stroke is uncertain. We evaluated outcomes in the NINDS tPA stroke study in relation to blood pressure declines during the first 24 h after randomization.
methodsDeclines in blood pressure compared to baseline and preceding time points were analyzed in relationship to favorable outcomes (by a global test), poor outcomes (Rankin scale >3) and death at 3 months.
results551 patients did not receive immediate pre-randomization anti-hypertensive treatment and had available blood pressures. Multivariate analysis showed significantly and progressively reducing likelihoods of a favorable outcome with each 10 mmHg decline in systolic blood pressure (SBP) >50 mmHg compared to any preceding measurement. Poor outcomes were significantly more likely in patients with >50 mmHg SBP reduction (or >30 mmHg compared to any immediately preceding measurement). There was an increased risk of death with blood pressure declines >60 mmHg. tPA treatment still produced favorable outcomes compared with placebo even with blood pressure declines. The median largest SBP reduction from baseline in patients treated with tPA was 35 mmHg compared to 30 mmHg in placebo-treated patients (p<0.01).
conclusionsIn this post hoc analysis, progressively reducing likelihoods of a favorable outcome were seen with increasing declines in SBP. Despite a greater likelihood of favorable outcomes, tPA treatment was associated with a greater reduction in blood pressure than placebo. Randomized trials of blood pressure management are needed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.