Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18455131›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of obstetrics and gynecology2008

Neurodevelopmental outcome of premature infants after exposure to antenatal indomethacin.

Sanjiv B Amin, Majeeda Kamaluddeen, Madhavi Sangem

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of obstetrics and gynecology, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Indomethacin tocolysis and neurodevelopmental outcome.Indian journal of pediatrics · 2011
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Sanjiv B AminDepartment of Pediatrics, Golisano Children's Hospital at Strong, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY, USA. Sanjiv_Amin@urmc.rochester.edu
Majeeda Kamaluddeen
Madhavi Sangem
University of Maryland, Baltimore · USUniversity of Maryland Medical Center · USUniversity of Rochester Medical Center · US

Funding

Bilirubin-induced Auditory Neuropathy in PretermsK23DC006229 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER · PI AMIN, SANJIV B · 2004 to 2008
$966k
NIDCD NIH HHS K23 DC006229NIDCD NIH HHS K-23 DC 06229
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThis study was undertaken to evaluate the effect of antenatal indomethacin exposure on neurodevelopmental outcomes of premature infants. STUDY

designA retrospective cohort study was performed to compare neurodevelopmental outcomes between premature infants exposed to antenatal indomethacin and infants unexposed to antenatal indomethacin. Inclusion criteria included all 23-29 weeks' gestational age infants delivered between January 1998 and December 2002 who had neurodevelopmental evaluation performed at 16-24 months corrected age. Outborn infants and those with major congenital malformations or chromosomal problems were excluded. Continuous and categorical variables were analyzed by using t test and chi(2) test, respectively.

resultsA total of 255, 23-29 weeks' gestational age infants were delivered between January 1998 and December 2002. Of the 87 infants who met inclusion criteria, 29 infants were exposed to antenatal indomethacin (mean dose 267 mg and median duration 3 days) and 58 infants were unexposed to antenatal indomethacin. There were no significant differences between the 2 groups in clinical characteristics, except for gestational age, mode of delivery, and antenatal steroid exposure. There was no significant difference in major neurosensory abnormality (cerebral palsy and/or deafness and/or blindness); however, the proportion of infants with subnormal Bayley-Mental Developmental Index (70 or less) and neurodevelopmental impairment (neurosensory abnormality and/or Mental Developmental Index 70 or less) was significantly less in the group exposed to antenatal indomethacin compared with unexposed group. When controlled for confounders including antenatal steroids, antenatal indomethacin was not associated with Mental Developmental Index 70 or less (odds ratio 0.44, 95% confidence interval 0.12-1.5) and neurodevelopmental impairment (odds ratio 0.4, 95% confidence interval 0.13-1.2) by using logistic regression. Subgroup analysis of 12 infants exposed to antenatal indomethacin within 48 hours of birth was not associated with neurodevelopmental impairment (odds ratio 0.2, 95% confidence interval 0.03-1.02) compared with unexposed group.

conclusionAntenatal indomethacin is not associated with abnormal neurodevelopmental outcome in infants 29 or less weeks' gestational age.

Indexed as

Prenatal Exposure Delayed EffectsAdultAnti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-SteroidalCentral Nervous SystemChild DevelopmentCohort StudiesFemaleGestational AgeHumansIndomethacinInfant, NewbornInfant, PrematureNeuropsychological TestsPregnancyPregnancy OutcomePsychomotor PerformanceAnti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-SteroidalIndomethacin

Identifiers

PMID18455131
PMCPMC2519240
OpenAlexW1982953399

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.