Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18453548›Full record

ArticleMolecular biology and evolution2008

Confirming the phylogeny of mammals by use of large comparative sequence data sets.

Arjun B Prasad, Marc W Allard, NISC Comparative Sequencing Program, Eric D Green

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular biology and evolution, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 92 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
92citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

92 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Is Phylotranscriptomics as Reliable as Phylogenomics?Molecular biology and evolution · 2020
    Article
  8. Molecular evolution of the meiotic recombination pathway in mammals.Evolution; international journal of organic evolution · 2019
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Genes · 2019
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Split-inducing indels in phylogenomic analysis.Algorithms for molecular biology : AMB · 2018
    Article
  13. Molecular evolution of type II MAGE genes from ancestral MAGED2 gene and their phylogenetic resolution of basal mammalian clades.Mammalian genome : official journal of the International Mammalian Genome Society · 2017
    Article
  14. Genomic evidence reveals a radiation of placental mammals uninterrupted by the KPg boundary.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2017
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Resolving the relationships of Paleocene placental mammals.Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society · 2017
    Article

32 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Arjun B PrasadGenome Technology Branch, National Human Genome Research Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Marc W Allard
NISC Comparative Sequencing Program
Eric D Green

Funding

Inter- and Intra-Species Comparative SequencingZIBHG000196 · NHGRI · NATIONAL HUMAN GENOME RESEARCH INSTITUTE · PI THOMAS, JAMES · 2009 to 2025
$177.6M
Multi-Species Comparative Sequencing of Targeted GenomicZ01HG000196 · NHGRI · NATIONAL HUMAN GENOME RESEARCH INSTITUTE · PI GREEN, ERIC · 2001 to 2008
$19.1M
Structural and Functional Analysis of Mammalian ChromosomesZIAHG000060 · NHGRI · NATIONAL HUMAN GENOME RESEARCH INSTITUTE · PI GREEN, ERIC · 2009 to 2010
$4.3M
Intramural NIH HHS Z01 HG000196Intramural NIH HHS Z99 HG999999
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The ongoing generation of prodigious amounts of genomic sequence data from myriad vertebrates is providing unparalleled opportunities for establishing definitive phylogenetic relationships among species. The size and complexities of such comparative sequence data sets not only allow smaller and more difficult branches to be resolved but also present unique challenges, including large computational requirements and the negative consequences of systematic biases. To explore these issues and to clarify the phylogenetic relationships among mammals, we have analyzed a large data set of over 60 megabase pairs (Mb) of high-quality genomic sequence, which we generated from 41 mammals and 3 other vertebrates. All sequences are orthologous to a 1.9-Mb region of the human genome that encompasses the cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator gene (CFTR). To understand the characteristics and challenges associated with phylogenetic analyses of such a large data set, we partitioned the sequence data in several ways and utilized maximum likelihood, maximum parsimony, and Neighbor-Joining algorithms, implemented in parallel on Linux clusters. These studies yielded well-supported phylogenetic trees, largely confirming other recent molecular phylogenetic analyses. Our results provide support for rooting the placental mammal tree between Atlantogenata (Xenarthra and Afrotheria) and Boreoeutheria (Euarchontoglires and Laurasiatheria), illustrate the difficulty in resolving some branches even with large amounts of data (e.g., in the case of Laurasiatheria), and demonstrate the valuable role that very large comparative sequence data sets can play in refining our understanding of the evolutionary relationships of vertebrates.

Indexed as

Sequence Analysis, DNAAnimalsChromosome MappingChromosomes, Human, Pair 7Conserved SequenceHumansMammalsMolecular Sequence DataPhylogenySequence AlignmentSpecies Specificity

Identifiers

PMID18453548
PMCPMC2515873

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.