ArticleCancer science2008
Tumor blood flow interruption after radiotherapy strongly inhibits tumor regrowth.
Article in Cancer science, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
- Prevention of cancer recurrence in tumor margins by stopping microcirculation in the tumor and tumor-host interface.Cancer science · 2014Article
- The vascular disrupting agent ombrabulin (AVE8062) enhances the efficacy of standard therapies in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma xenograft models.Investigational new drugs · 2013Article
- Assessment of the novel tubulin-binding agent EHT 6706 in combination with ionizing radiation or chemotherapy.Investigational new drugs · 2012Article
- BMS-690514, a VEGFR and EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor, shows anti-tumoural activity on non-small-cell lung cancer xenografts and induces sequence-dependent synergistic effect with radiation.British journal of cancer · 2010Article
- Microtubule depolymerizing vascular disrupting agents: novel therapeutic agents for oncology and other pathologies.International journal of experimental pathology · 2009Review
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
To clarify the therapeutic significance of interrupting tumor blood flow after irradiation, we investigated X-irradiation-induced changes in hemodynamic parameters (blood flow, extravasation and washout of fluorescein isothiocyanate-dextran, and interstitial fluid pressure) in a variant of Yoshida sarcoma, LY80. Tumors in anesthetized male Donryu rats received local irradiation (10 Gy). At 48 h after irradiation, tumor blood flow increased significantly; at 72-96 h after irradiation, a 2-2.5-fold increase was observed. All parameters then consistently showed improved tumor microcirculation, which probably contributed to regrowth of cancer because certain cells survived irradiation. Rats received an intravenous dose (10 mg/kg) of a combretastatin derivative, AC7700 (AVE8062), which interrupts tumor blood flow and disrupts tumor vessels. At all times evaluated after irradiation, AC7700 completely stopped tumor blood flow. Radiotherapy efficacy was significantly enhanced when combined with AC7700: AC7700 given 48 h after irradiation, when tumor blood flow increased significantly, remarkably suppressed tumor regrowth compared with AC7700 given 48 h before irradiation. Also, postirradiation AC7700 completely inhibited not only primary tumor regrowth but also regional lymph node metastases in half of tumor-bearing rats and led to a significant improvement in survival. These results strongly suggest that the combination effect was enhanced via interruption of increased tumor blood flow after irradiation. This therapeutic combination and timing may have important benefits, even in tumors with low sensitivity to either treatment alone, because the effect was considerably greater than additive. Our data thus show that destruction of tumor microcirculation after irradiation is quite effective for preventing cancer recurrence.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.