Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18449865›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of medical genetics. Part B, Neuropsychiatric genetics : the official publication of the International Society of Psychiatric Genetics2009

The validity of the family history screen for assessing family history of mental disorders.

B J Milne, A Caspi, R Crump, R Poulton, M Rutter, M R Sears, T E Moffitt

Abstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of medical genetics. Part B, Neuropsychiatric genetics : the official publication of the International Society of Psychiatric Genetics, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 52 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
52citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

52 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. The clinical characterization of the adult patient with bipolar disorder aimed at personalization of management.World psychiatry : official journal of the World Psychiatric Association (WPA) · 2022
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

B J MilneSocial, Genetic, and Developmental Psychiatry Centre, Institute of Psychiatry, King's College, London, UK. b.milne@iop.kcl.ac.uk
A Caspi
R Crump
R Poulton
M Rutter
M R Sears
T E Moffitt

Funding

Is mental disorder a preventable cause of age-related disease? The Dunedin Study.R01AG032282 · NIA · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI CASPI, AVSHALOM, MOFFITT, TERRIE E · 2009 to 2025
$9.5M
SELF-REPORT DELINQUENCY: A LONGITUDINAL STUDYR01MH045070 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN MADISON · PI MOFFITT, TERRIE EDITH · 1989 to 2006
$2.5M
Personality and Health from Childhood to AdulthoodR01MH049414 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI CASPI, AVSHALOM · 1997 to 2006
$1.8M
Uncovering and confirming gene-environment interactions in psychopathologyR01MH077874 · NIMH · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI CASPI, AVSHALOM · 2007 to 2010
$1.6M
MENTAL HEALTH IN THE TRANSITION TO ADULTHOODR29MH049414 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN MADISON · PI CASPI, AVSHALOM · 1992 to 1996
–
Medical Research Council G0100527Medical Research Council G0601483NIA NIH HHS R01 AG032282NIMH NIH HHS MH077874NIMH NIH HHS MH45070NIMH NIH HHS MH49414NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH045070NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH049414NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH077874
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There is a need to collect psychiatric family history information quickly and economically (e.g., for genome-wide studies and primary care practice). We sought to evaluate the validity of family history reports using a brief screening instrument, the Family History Screen (FHS). We assessed the validity of parents' reports of seven psychiatric disorders in their adult children probands from the Dunedin Study (n = 959, 52% male), using the proband's diagnosis as the criterion outcome. We also investigated whether there were informant characteristics that enhanced accuracy of reporting or were associated with reporting biases. Using reports from multiple informants, we obtained sensitivities ranging from 31.7% (alcohol dependence) to 60.0% (conduct disorder) and specificities ranging from 76.0% (major depressive episode) to 97.1% (suicide attempt). There was little evidence that any informant characteristics enhanced accuracy of reporting. However, three reporting biases were found: the probability of reporting disorder in the proband was greater for informants with versus without a disorder, for female versus male informants, and for younger versus older informants. We conclude that the FHS is as valid as other family history instruments (e.g., the FH-RDC, FISC), and its brief administration time makes it a cost-effective method for collecting family history data. To avoid biasing results, researchers who aim to compare groups in terms of their family history should ensure that the informants reporting on these groups do not differ in terms of age, sex or personal history of disorder.

Indexed as

Genetic Predisposition to DiseaseMedical History TakingAdultFemaleHumansMaleMental Disorders

Identifiers

PMID18449865
PMCPMC3750954

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.