Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18449806›Full record

ArticleHealth care analysis : HCA : journal of health philosophy and policy2008

An ethical analysis of international health priority-setting.

Nuala Kenny, Christine Joffres

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Health care analysis : HCA : journal of health philosophy and policy, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Priority setting in the German healthcare system: results from a discrete choice experiment.International journal of health economics and management · 2023
    Article
  3. Model for Value-based Policy-making in Health Systems.International journal of preventive medicine · 2021
    Review
  4. Severity as a Priority Setting Criterion: Setting a Challenging Research Agenda.Health care analysis : HCA : journal of health philosophy and policy · 2020
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Evidence, Emotion and Eminence: A Qualitative and Evaluative Analysis of Doctors' Skills in Macroallocation.Health care analysis : HCA : journal of health philosophy and policy · 2019
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Doctors on Values and Advocacy: A Qualitative and Evaluative Study.Health care analysis : HCA : journal of health philosophy and policy · 2017
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Prioritisation in healthcare--still muddling through.Medicine, health care, and philosophy · 2011
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Israeli lay persons' views on priority-setting criteria for Alzheimer's disease.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2009
    Article
  19. The power of "principles" in a national pharmaceuticals strategy.Healthcare policy = Politiques de sante · 2009
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Nuala KennyDepartment of Bioethics, Dalhousie University, 5848 University Avenue, Halifax, NS, Canada B3H 4H7. nuala.kenny@dal.ca
Christine Joffres

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Health care systems throughout the developed world face 'crises' of quality, financing and sustainability. These pressures have led governments to look for more efficient and equitable ways to allocate public resources. Prioritisation of health care services for public funding has been one of the strategies used by decision makers to reconcile growing health care demands with limited resources. Priority setting at the macro level has yet to demonstrate real successes. This paper describes international approaches to explicit prioritisation at the macro-governmental level in the six experiences most published in the English literature; analyzes the ways in which values, principles and other normative concepts were presented in these international priority setting experiences; and identifies key elements of a more robust framework for ethical analysis which could promote meaningful and effective health priority setting.

Indexed as

Ethical AnalysisHealth PrioritiesBioethicsDelivery of Health CareHealth Services Research

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.