Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18449064›Full record

Trial reportThe Pediatric infectious disease journal2008

A randomized controlled trial of the impact of chlorhexidine skin cleansing on bacterial colonization of hospital-born infants in Nepal.

Luke C Mullany, Subarna K Khatry, Jeevan B Sherchand, Steven C LeClerq, Gary L Darmstadt, Joanne Katz, Punita Gauchan, Ramesh K Adhikari, Ashma Rana, James M Tielsch

2 registry-linked trialsOpen access · greenAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in The Pediatric infectious disease journal, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 17 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
5.2field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT00109616 phase3completednot on this map

Newborn Antiseptic Washing and Neonatal Mortality-Nepal

TypeinterventionalSponsorEunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD)Ran2002 to 2006Enrolled17,000ConditionsNeonatal MortalityArmsNewborn skin cleansing with 0.25% chlorhexidine solution, Cleansing of umbilical cord with soap and water solution, Cleansing of umbilical cord with 4% chlorhexidine
NCT06590675 naterminatednot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

Development and Evaluation of a ChlorHexidine Gluconate bAthing pRotocol for Healthcare Settings in Low- and Middle-income Countries

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of PennsylvaniaRan2025 to 2025Enrolled19ConditionsMultidrug Resistant Bacterial InfectionArmsChlorhexidine Gluconate (CHG)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Umbilical cord antiseptics for preventing sepsis and death among newborns.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Umbilical cord antiseptics for preventing sepsis and death among newborns.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2013
    Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Indicators of skin barrier integrity among newborns massaged with mustard oil in rural Nepal.Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2018
    Observational
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Safety of chlorhexidine gluconate used for skin antisepsis in the preterm infant.Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2012
    Article
  17. Incidence and seasonality of hypothermia among newborns in southern Nepal.Archives of pediatrics & adolescent medicine · 2010
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Luke C MullanyInternational Center for Advancing Neonatal Health, Department of International Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA. lmullany@jhsph.edu
Subarna K Khatry
Jeevan B Sherchand
Steven C LeClerq
Gary L Darmstadt
Joanne Katz
Punita Gauchan
Ramesh K Adhikari
Ashma Rana
James M Tielsch
Johns Hopkins University · USTribhuvan University · NP

Funding

XRAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA013148 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM · PI Robert S Welner · 1985 to 2026
$165.9M
ZINC SUPPLEMENTATION IMPACT ON CHILD MORTALITY--NEPALR01HD038753 · NICHD · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI TIELSCH, JAMES M · 2000 to 2003
$3.5M
Newborn Antiseptic Washing and Neonatal Mortality-NepalR01HD044004 · NICHD · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI TIELSCH, JAMES M · 2003 to 2005
$1.5M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA013148NCI NIH HHS P30 CA13148NICHD NIH HHS HD 38753NICHD NIH HHS HD 44004NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD038753NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD044004
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundChlorhexidine skin cleansing might substantially reduce neonatal infection and mortality in developing countries. Few data exist on the impact of chlorhexidine cleansing on skin colonization of infants during the first day of life or on the absorption potential of chlorhexidine during newborn skin cleansing.

methodsHospital-born newborns in Kathmandu, Nepal were randomly allocated to full-body skin cleansing with 0.25%, 0.50%, or 1.00% chlorhexidine solution. Skin swabs were collected from the axilla, inguinal, and peri-umbilical areas before cleansing (baseline), and at 2 and 24 hours after treatment. Skin flora was quantified and organisms identified. In a subsample, heel prick blood was collected 24 hours after the cleansing and percutaneous absorption of chlorhexidine was assessed.

resultsAmong 286 enrolled newborns, no adverse effects on skin were reported and body temperature was minimally reduced (mean reduction, 0.33 degrees C). In all groups, positive skin culture rates were significantly reduced at 2 hours but generally not at 24 hours; greater reductions were observed with higher concentrations of chlorhexidine. Effect at 24 hours was highest in the 1.00% group (37% lower positive skin culture rate). For 15 of 75 infants with heel pricks, chlorhexidine was detected at trace concentrations (<8 ng/mL, n = 14; 25.8 ng/mL, n = 1).

conclusionsChlorhexidine skin cleansing seemed safe and reduced skin flora in newborns in a dose-dependent manner 2 hours after treatment. Greater residual effect at the highest concentration (1%) might provide broader benefit and may simplify combined maternal and neonatal regimens by matching the concentration used for vaginal cleansing during labor.

Indexed as

Anti-Infective Agents, LocalBacteriaBlood Chemical AnalysisChlorhexidineColony Count, MicrobialFemaleHospitalsHumansInfant, NewbornMaleMothersNepalSkinSkin Diseases, BacterialAnti-Infective Agents, LocalChlorhexidine

Identifiers

PMID18449064
PMCPMC2562933
OpenAlexW2045971287

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.