Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18448689›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical microbiology2008

Tuberculosis diagnosis and multidrug resistance testing by direct sputum culture in selective broth without decontamination or centrifugation.

Louis Grandjean, Laura Martin, Robert H Gilman, Teresa Valencia, Beatriz Herrera, Willi Quino, Eric Ramos, Maribel Rivero, Rosario Montoya, A Roderick Escombe and 3 more

Open access · greenAbstract readComparative StudyEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical microbiology, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Advances in TB testing.Advances in clinical chemistry · 2023
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Clinical evaluation of tuberculosis viability microscopy for assessing treatment response.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2015
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Tuberculosis diagnostics: Challenges and opportunities.Lung India : official organ of Indian Chest Society · 2012
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Optimizing tuberculosis testing for basic laboratories.The American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene · 2010
    Article
  17. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Louis GrandjeanDepartamento de Microbiología, Facultad de Ciencias, Laboratorios de Investigación y Desarrollo, Universidad Peruana Cayetano Heredia, Lima, Perú.
Laura Martin
Robert H Gilman
Teresa Valencia
Beatriz Herrera
Willi Quino
Eric Ramos
Maribel Rivero
Rosario Montoya
A Roderick Escombe
David Coleman
Denis Mitchison
Carlton A Evans
Universidad Peruana Cayetano Heredia · PEHammersmith Hospital · GBPrisma · PESt George's Hospital · GBSt George's, University of London · GB

Funding

Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Tuberculosis culture usually requires sputum decontamination and centrifugation to prevent cultures from being overgrown by contaminating bacteria and fungi. However, decontamination destroys many tuberculous bacilli, and centrifugation often is not possible in resource-poor settings. We therefore assessed the performance of Mycobacterium tuberculosis culture with unprocessed samples plated directly by using tuberculosis-selective media and compared this procedure to conventional culture using centrifuge decontamination. Quadruplicate aliquots of strain H37RV were cultured in 7H9 broth with and without selective antimicrobials and after centrifuge decontamination. The subsequent comparison was made with 715 sputum samples. Split paired sputum samples were cultured conventionally with centrifuge decontamination and by direct culture in tuberculosis-selective media containing antibiotics. Centrifuge decontamination reduced tuberculosis H37RV colonies by 78% (P < 0.001), whereas direct culture in tuberculosis-selective media had no inhibitory effect. Similarly, in sputum cultures that were not overgrown by contaminants, conventional culture yielded fewer tuberculosis colonies than direct culture (P < 0.001). However, the sensitivity of conventional culture was greater than that of direct culture, because samples were less affected by contamination. Thus, of the 340 sputum samples that were tuberculosis culture positive, conventional culture detected 97%, whereas direct culture detected 81% (P < 0.001). Conventional and direct cultures both took a median of 8.0 days to diagnose tuberculosis (P = 0.8). In those direct cultures that detected drug resistance or susceptibility, there was a 97% agreement with the results of conventional culture (Kappa agreement statistic, 0.84; P < 0.001). Direct culture is a simple, low-technology, and rapid technique for diagnosing tuberculosis and determining drug susceptibility. Compared to that of conventional culture, direct culture has reduced sensitivity because of bacterial overgrowth, but in basic laboratories this deficit may be outweighed by the ease of use.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAnti-Bacterial AgentsCentrifugationChildChild, PreschoolColony Count, MicrobialCulture MediaDecontaminationFemaleHumansInfantMaleMiddle AgedAnti-Bacterial AgentsCulture Media

Identifiers

PMID18448689
PMCPMC2446921
OpenAlexW2125460690

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.