Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18447403›Full record

ReviewDrugs & aging2008

Alternatives to atypical antipsychotics for the management of dementia-related agitation.

Michael J Passmore, David M Gardner, Yvette Polak, Kiran Rabheru

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Drugs & aging, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
4.9field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Cannabinoids for Agitation in Alzheimer's Disease.The American journal of geriatric psychiatry : official journal of the American Association for Geriatric Psychiatry · 2021
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Antipsychotic and benzodiazepine use among nursing home residents: findings from the 2004 National Nursing Home Survey.The American journal of geriatric psychiatry : official journal of the American Association for Geriatric Psychiatry · 2010
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Michael J PassmoreDepartment of Psychiatry, Division of Geriatric Psychiatry, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada. passmoremd@gmail.com
David M Gardner
Yvette Polak
Kiran Rabheru
University of British Columbia · CADalhousie University · CAUniversity of Alberta · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Numerous recent studies have challenged the widely held belief that atypical antipsychotics are safe and effective options for the treatment of behavioural problems such as agitation in patients with dementia. Accordingly, there is a need to reconsider the place of atypical antipsychotics in the treatment of patients with dementia. The present article is intended to assist clinicians with the assessment and pharmacological management of agitation in patients with dementia. We review the risk-benefit evidence for the use of atypical antipsychotics in patients with dementia-related agitation (DRA). Emerging evidence indicates that, for patients with dementia, the risks associated with atypical antipsychotics may outweigh the benefits except for patients with severe agitation who require short-term chemical restraint. We then discuss the importance of a careful assessment to rule out potentially reversible factors contributing to DRA. Finally, we summarize the evidence supporting the use of medications other than antipsychotics to treat DRA. There is wide variability in the levels of evidence supporting the use of non-antipsychotic medication for the treatment of DRA. The best evidence currently exists for cholinesterase inhibitors and serotonin-specific reuptake inhibitor antidepressants. Emerging reports suggest that numerous other medications, for example, antiepileptics, lithium, anxiolytics, analgesics, beta-adrenoceptor antagonists, cannabinoid receptor agonists and hormonal agents, may prove to be viable alternatives to antipsychotics for the treatment of severe DRA and more research is urgently needed to help assess the effectiveness of these agents. A comprehensive biopsychosocial assessment and treatment plan is likely the most effective way to manage DRA.

Indexed as

Antipsychotic AgentsDementiaPsychomotor AgitationAdrenergic beta-AntagonistsAgedAged, 80 and overAnalgesicsAnti-Anxiety AgentsAnticonvulsantsAntidepressive AgentsCannabinoid Receptor AgonistsCholinesterase InhibitorsExcitatory Amino Acid AntagonistsHumansNicotinic AgonistsRisk AssessmentAdrenergic beta-AntagonistsAnalgesicsAnti-Anxiety AgentsAnticonvulsantsAntidepressive AgentsAntipsychotic AgentsCannabinoid Receptor AgonistsCholinesterase InhibitorsExcitatory Amino Acid AntagonistsNicotinic Agonists

Identifiers

PMID18447403
OpenAlexW1969535172

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.