Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18447102›Full record

ArticleEthnicity & disease2008

Socioeconomic factors and women's use of complementary and alternative medicine in four racial/ethnic groups.

Maria T Chao, Christine M Wade

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ethnicity & disease, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Feasibility of Implementation Mapping for Integrative Medical Group Visits.Journal of alternative and complementary medicine (New York, N.Y.) · 2021
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Maria T ChaoThe Richard and Hinda Rosenthal Center for Complementary and Alternative Medicine, Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Columbia University, New York, New York, USA. mtc28@columbia.edu
Christine M Wade

Funding

WOMEN'S ALTERNATIVE MEDICINE USE--MULTIETHNIC SURVEYR01HD037073 · NICHD · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI KRONENBERG, FREDI · 2000 to 2001
$1.4M
Women's Use of Alternative Medicine: A Multiethnic StudyF31AT001401 · NCCIH · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI CHAO, MARIA T · 2003 to 2004
$62k
NCCIH NIH HHS F31AT0001401NCCIH NIH HHS F31 AT001401NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD037073NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD 37073
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveHigher socioeconomic status (SES) is associated with using complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) in national surveys. Less is known about how socioeconomic factors affect CAM use in US subpopulations. We examined whether the relationship between SES and CAM use differs by racial/ethnic groups.

methodsUsing national survey data, we assessed education and income effects on women's CAM use in four racial/ethnic groups (Whites, Blacks, Mexican Americans, and Chinese Americans), controlling for age, health status, and geographic region. CAM use was defined as using any of 11 domains in the prior year.

resultsAdjusted effects of SES on CAM use were similar among Mexican American and non-Hispanic White women--education had a distinct gradient effect, with each increasing level of education significantly more likely to use CAM; household income > or = $60,000 was associated with CAM use compared to income < $20,000. For Chinese American women, socioeconomic factors were not associated with CAM use when controlling for confounders. Although income was not associated with CAM use among African American women, college graduates were three times more likely to use CAM than those with less than a high school education, adjusting for confounders.

conclusionSES effects on CAM use are not uniform across racial/ethnic populations. Other factors, such as culture and social networks, may interact with SES to influence CAM use in minority populations.

Indexed as

EthnicityAdultComplementary TherapiesCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMiddle AgedSocioeconomic FactorsUnited States

Identifiers

PMID18447102
PMCPMC4160874

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.