Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18446520›Full record

ReviewThe AAPS journal2008

Reaction phenotyping: current industry efforts to identify enzymes responsible for metabolizing drug candidates.

Timothy W Harper, Patrick J Brassil

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The AAPS journal, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. In vitro to in vivo extrapolation for high throughput prioritization and decision making.Toxicology in vitro : an international journal published in association with BIBRA · 2018
    Review
  6. Article
  7. In vitro metabolism of piperaquine is primarily mediated by CYP3A4.Xenobiotica; the fate of foreign compounds in biological systems · 2012
    Article
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Timothy W HarperDepartment of Metabolism and Pharmacokinetics, Bristol-Myers Squibb, PO Box 5400, Mail Stop 17-12, Princeton, New Jersey 08543-5400, USA. timothy.harper@bms.com
Patrick J Brassil

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Reaction phenotyping studies to identify specific enzymes involved in the metabolism of drug candidates are increasingly important in drug discovery efforts. Experimental approaches used for CYP reaction phenotyping include incubations with cDNA expressed CYP enzyme systems and incubations containing specific CYP enzyme inhibitors. Since both types of experiments present specific advantages as well as known drawbacks, these studies are generally viewed as complementary approaches. Although glucuronidation pathways are also known to present potential drug-drug interaction issues as well as challenges related to their polymorphic expression, reaction phenotyping approaches for glucuronidation are generally limited to cDNA expressed systems due to lack of availability of specific UGT inhibitors. This article presents a limited review of current approaches to reaction phenotyping studies used within the pharmaceutical industry.

Indexed as

PhenotypeAnimalsCytochrome P-450 Enzyme SystemDrug IndustryHumansPharmaceutical PreparationsCytochrome P-450 Enzyme SystemPharmaceutical Preparations

Identifiers

PMID18446520
PMCPMC2751464

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.