Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18446319›Full record

ArticleIntensive care medicine2008

Primary and secondary intra-abdominal hypertension--different impact on ICU outcome.

Annika Reintam, Pille Parm, Reet Kitus, Hartmut Kern, Joel Starkopf

2 registry-linked trialsAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Intensive care medicine, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 35 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
6.6field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02944292 phase4unknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2016, after this paper: background citation

Prospective, Interventional Multicentre Study on the Effect of Deepening of Sedation on Intra-abdominal Pressure

TypeinterventionalSponsorTartu University HospitalRan2016 to 2018Enrolled40ConditionsIntra-abdominal HypertensionArmsDeepening of sedation, Propofol
NCT03163095 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2019, after this paper: background citation

Closed Versus Open Abdomen in the Surgical Treatment of Severe Secondary Peritonitis: a Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of CalgaryRan2019 to 2025Enrolled550ConditionsAbdominal Sepsis, Abdominal InfectionArmsOpen Abdomen Management with ANPPT dressing, Closed Abdomen Management
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 111 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Observational
  12. Article
  13. Mild to moderate intra-abdominal hypertension: Does it matter?World journal of critical care medicine · 2016
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Observational
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Annika ReintamClinic of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care, University of Tartu, Puusepa 8, 51014, Tartu, Estonia. annika.reintam@itk.ee
Pille Parm
Reet Kitus
Hartmut Kern
Joel Starkopf
Tartu University Hospital · EEUniversity of Tartu · EE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo investigate the differences in incidence, time course and outcome of primary versus secondary intra-abdominal hypertension (IAH), and to evaluate IAH as an independent risk factor of mortality in a presumable risk population of critically ill patients.

designProspective observational study.

settingGeneral intensive care unit of a university hospital. PATIENTS: A total of 257 mechanically ventilated patients at presumable risk for the development of IAH were studied during their ICU stay and followed up for 90-day survival.

interventionsRepeated measurements of intra-abdominal pressure (IAP). MEASUREMENTS AND

resultsIAP was measured intermittently, via bladder. IAH (sustained or repeated IAP > or = 12 mmHg) developed in 95 patients (37.0%). Primary IAH was observed in 60 and secondary IAH in 35 patients. Patients with secondary IAH demonstrated a significant increase of mean IAP during the first three days (mean DeltaIAP was 2.2 +/- 4.7 mmHg), whilst IAP decreased (mean DeltaIAP -1.1 +/- 3.7 mmHg) in the patients with primary IAH. The patients with IAH had a significantly higher ICU- (37.9 vs. 19.1%; P = 0.001), 28-day (48.4 vs. 27.8%, P = 0.001), and 90-day mortality (53.7 vs. 35.8%, P = 0.004) compared to the patients without the syndrome. Patients with secondary IAH had a significantly higher ICU mortality than patients with primary IAH (P = 0.032). Development of IAH was identified as an independent risk factor for death (OR 2.52; 95% CI 1.23-5.14).

conclusionsSecondary IAH is less frequent, has a different time course and worse outcome than primary IAH. Development of IAH during ICU period is an independent risk factor for death.

Indexed as

AbdomenHospital MortalityCompartment SyndromesFemaleHumansHypertensionIntensive Care UnitsLength of StayMaleMiddle AgedPressureProspective StudiesRespiration, ArtificialRisk FactorsROC CurveSeverity of Illness Index

Identifiers

PMID18446319
OpenAlexW1989881714

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.