ReviewJournal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association2008
Surfactants: past, present and future.
Review in Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 84 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
84 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 248 citations in OpenAlex.
- The Care of Preterm and Term Newborns with Respiratory Conditions: A Systematic Synthesis of Evidence from Low- and Middle-Income Countries.Neonatology · 2025Pooled it
- Surfactant therapy guided by tests for lung maturity in preterm infants at risk of respiratory distress syndrome.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2023Pooled it
- Health Economic Studies of Surfactant Replacement Therapy in Neonates with Respiratory Distress Syndrome: A Systematic Literature Review.PharmacoEconomics - open · 2023Pooled it
- Comparison of animal-derived surfactants for the prevention and treatment of respiratory distress syndrome in preterm infants.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2015Pooled it
- Antenatal steroids in preterm labour for the prevention of neonatal deaths due to complications of preterm birth.International journal of epidemiology · 2010Pooled it
- Lung Surfactant Accelerates Skin Wound Healing: A Translational Study with a Randomized Clinical Phase I Study.Scientific reports · 2020Trial
- Poractant alfa versus bovine lipid extract surfactant for infants 24+0 to 31+6 weeks gestational age: A randomized controlled trial.PloS one · 2017Trial
- Early prophylactic versus late selective use of surfactant for respiratory distress syndrome in very preterm infants: a collaborative study of 53 multi-center trials in Korea.Journal of Korean medical science · 2014Trial
- Spontaneous Achievers, Responders and Non-Responders: Aligning Treatment With the Natural History of Bronchopulmonary Dysplasia in Preterm Infants.Acta paediatrica (Oslo, Norway : 1992) · 2026Review
- Collaboration between Japanese and international scientists in developing and commercializing of exogenous surfactant.Pediatric research · 2026Article
- Non-Invasive Surfactant Administration in Preterm Infants.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Temporal trends in surfactant replacement therapy among U.S. infants, 2016-2024.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2026Article
- Misinformation and disinformation undermine progress in pediatric research: challenges and solutions.Pediatric research · 2025Article
- Novel mitophagy inducer TJ0113 alleviates pulmonary inflammation during acute lung injury.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2025Article
- Structural Characteristics, Electronic Properties, and Coupling Behavior of 12-4-12, 12-3-12, 12-2-12 Cationic Surfactants: A First-Principles Computational Investigation and Experimental Raman Spectroscopy.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Article
- Life-saving effect of pulmonary surfactant in premature babies.The Journal of clinical investigation · 2024Article
- Revisiting surfactant protein D: an immune surveillance molecule bridging innate and adaptive immunity.Frontiers in immunology · 2024Review
- Surfactant replacement therapy as promising treatment for COVID-19: an updated narrative review.Bioscience reports · 2023Review
- Clinical decision thresholds for surfactant administration in preterm infants: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.EClinicalMedicine · 2023Article
24 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
In 1929 Kurt von Neergaard performed experiments suggesting the presence of pulmonary surfactant and its relevance to the newborn's first breath. Almost 25 years later, Richard Pattle, John Clements and Chris Macklin, each working on the effects of nerve gases on the lungs, contributed to the understanding of the physiology of pulmonary surfactant. About 5 years later Mary Ellen Avery and Jere Mead published convincing evidence that preterm neonates dying of hyaline membrane disease (respiratory distress syndrome, RDS) had a deficiency of pulmonary surfactant. The first trials of nebulized synthetic (protein-free) surfactant to prevent RDS were published soon after Patrick Bouvier Kennedy (son of President John F Kennedy) died of this disorder after treatment in Boston. These trials were unsuccessful; however, Goran Enhorning and Bengt Robertson in the early 1970s demonstrated that natural surfactants (containing proteins) were effective in an immature rabbit model of RDS. Soon after this Forrest Adams showed that a natural surfactant was also effective in an immature lamb model. Working with him was Tetsuro Fujiwara who 2 years later, after returning to Japan, published the seminal article reporting the responses of 10 preterm infants with RDS to a bolus of modified bovine surfactant. During the 1980s there were numerous randomized controlled trials of many different natural and synthetic surfactants, demonstrating reductions in pulmonary air leaks and neonatal mortality. Subsequently natural surfactants were shown to be superior to the protein-free synthetic products. Recently there have been a number of randomized trials comparing different natural surfactant preparations. Commercially available bovine surfactants may have similar efficacy but there is some evidence that a porcine surfactant used to treat RDS with an initial dose of 200 mg per kg is more effective than a bovine surfactant used in an initial dose of 100 mg per kg. Bovine and porcine surfactants have not been compared in trials of prophylaxis. Very recently a new synthetic surfactant with a surfactant protein mimic has been compared with other commercially available natural and synthetic surfactants in two trials. The new surfactant may be superior to one of the older protein-free synthetic surfactants but there is no evidence of its superiority over established natural products and it is currently not approved for clinical use. A number of other new synthetic surfactants have been tested in animal models or in treatment of adults with ARDS, but so far there have been no reports of treatment of neonatal RDS. Natural surfactants work best if given by a rapid bolus into the lungs but less invasive methods such as a laryngeal mask, pharyngeal deposition or rapid extubation to CPAP have showed promise. Unfortunately, delivery of surfactant by nebulization has so far been ineffective. Surfactant treatment has been tried in a number of other neonatal respiratory disorders but only infants with meconium aspiration seem to benefit although larger and more frequent doses are probably needed to demonstrate improved lung function. A surfactant protocol based upon early treatment and CPAP is suggested for very preterm infants. Earlier treatment may improve survival rates for these infants; however, there is a risk of increasing the prevalence of milder forms of chronic lung disease. Nevertheless, surfactant therapy has been a major contribution to care of the preterm newborn during the past 25 years.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.