ArticleJournal of the Royal Society, Interface2008
Adaptive dynamics with a single two-state protein.
Article in Journal of the Royal Society, Interface, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Ultrasensitive Negative Feedback Control: A Natural Approach for the Design of Synthetic Controllers.PloS one · 2016Article
- Spatial Control of Biochemical Modification Cascades and Pathways.Biophysical journal · 2015Article
- The speed of change: towards a discontinuity theory of immunity?Nature reviews. Immunology · 2013Review
- Response dynamics of phosphorelays suggest their potential utility in cell signalling.Journal of the Royal Society, Interface · 2011Article
- Stochastic adaptation and fold-change detection: from single-cell to population behavior.BMC systems biology · 2011Article
- Adaptive response by state-dependent inactivation.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2009Article
- The control of the controller: molecular mechanisms for robust perfect adaptation and temperature compensation.Biophysical journal · 2009Article
- Cell cycle regulation by feed-forward loops coupling transcription and phosphorylation.Molecular systems biology · 2009Article
- Biological switches and clocks.Journal of the Royal Society, Interface · 2008Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
An important step towards understanding biological systems is to relate simple biochemical elements to dynamics. Here, we present the arguably simplest dynamical element in biochemical networks. It consists of a single protein with two states (active and inactive) and an external signal that catalyses the conversion between these two states. Further, there is steady synthesis and degradation of the inactive and active forms, respectively. As this element captures both structural and dynamical features of biochemical networks at the lowest level, we refer to it as a biochemical network unit (BioNetUnit). Using both simulations and mathematical analysis, we find that BioNetUnit shows perfect adaptation that leads to temporal responses to step changes in the incoming signal. Compared with a well-described adaptive system, which is found in bacterial chemotaxis, BioNetUnit has lower sensitivity and its adaptation time is less robust to the base signal levels. We show that these dynamical limitations lead to 'once-and-only-once' responses for certain signal sequences. These findings demonstrate that BioNetUnit is relevant in adaptive and cyclic processes. In particular, it could be seen as a generic representation for ligand-activated receptors that are desensitized upon continuous activation. The analysis of coupled BioNetUnits will show how the presented dynamics at single unit will change upon increased system complexity and how such systems would mediate biological functions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.