Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18445358›Full record

ReviewCurrent diabetes reports2008

TCF7L2 genetic defect and type 2 diabetes.

Stéphane Cauchi, Philippe Froguel

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Current diabetes reports, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed
4.6field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 87 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Robust Mixed Model Association Test for Gene-Environment Interactions.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2025
    Article
  2. Association ofDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Frontiers in endocrinology · 2022
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Human genetics of diabetic retinopathy.Journal of endocrinological investigation · 2014
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Stéphane Cauchi
Philippe Froguel
Imperial College London · GB

Funding

Medical Research Council G0600331
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

After two decades of limited success, the genetic architecture of type 2 diabetes (T2D) is finally being revealed. Within only 2 years, an avalanche of studies identified several genes expressed in pancreatic beta cells and involved in the control of insulin secretion, such as transcription factor 7-like 2 (TCF7L2), a key element of the Wnt signaling pathway. In Europeans, genome-wide association scans showed that TCF7L2 has been the most important locus predisposing to T2D so far. For the first time, a gene is consistently involved in T2D susceptibility in all major ethnic groups. At the individual level, carrying the TCF7L2 risk allele increases T2D risk 50%. However, at the population level, the attributable risk is lower than 25% and varies with the allele frequency. The presence of the TCF7L2 rs7903146 risk allele increases TCF7L2 gene expression in beta cells, possibly impairing glucagon-like peptide-1-induced insulin secretion and/or the production of new mature beta cells. The tremendous association of TCF7L2 polymorphisms with T2D provides new insights into future genetic predisposition tests but remains the tip of the T2D genetic iceberg.

Indexed as

AnimalsBody WeightDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2HumansPolymorphism, Single NucleotideSignal TransductionTCF Transcription FactorsTranscription Factor 7-Like 2 ProteinWnt ProteinsTCF7L2 protein, humanTCF Transcription FactorsTranscription Factor 7-Like 2 ProteinWnt Proteins

Identifiers

PMID18445358
OpenAlexW2106689948

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.