Trial reportClinical rheumatology2008
Effects of physical training on bone mineral density in fertile women with idiopathic osteoporosis.
Trial report in Clinical rheumatology, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Dilemmas in the Management of Osteoporosis in Younger Adults.JBMR plus · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The aim of this study was to investigate whether moderate physical training can improve the bone mineral density (BMD) in women with idiopathic osteoporosis. Ten pre-menopausal women aged 24-44 years diagnosed with idiopathic osteoporosis were included in the study. The physical training program consisted of three fast 30-min walks plus one or two sessions of 1-h training per week during 1 year at a training centre separate from the hospital. All patients were given supplements of vitamin D and calcium. Bone mineral density was measured in the femoral neck area and the lumbar spine by dual energy X-ray absorptiometry. The measurements were performed at baseline and after 12 months of training and compared with the measurements at the time of diagnosis, 1-3 years before the study. Eight women fulfilled the 12-month training period, and their mean (SD) BMD at start was 0.88 (0.08) g/cm(2) in the spine and 0.76 (0.13) g/cm(2) in the femoral neck. The mean spine BMD increase was 0.031 g/cm(2) (3.5%) after 1 year of training, which was significant (Wilcoxon's non-parametric test, p = 0.018). The mean increment in BMD in the femoral neck was insignificant, 0.007 g/cm(2) (0.9%) after the intervention (p = 0.74). However, the bone loss during the 1- to 3-year period from diagnosis to study start was, on average, 0.045 g/cm(2) or 5.0% in the femoral neck (p = 0.042), thus indicating a positive indirect effect of the intervention. There is no evidence-based therapy for women with idiopathic osteoporosis. It is therefore of importance to elucidate the impact of moderate physical activity in this group of patients. A 1-year training program was sufficient to induce a small but significant change in the spine BMD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.