Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18443672›Full record

Trial reportPain research & management

Once-daily, controlled-release tramadol and sustained-release diclofenac relieve chronic pain due to osteoarthritis: a randomized controlled trial.

A D Beaulieu, P M Peloso, B Haraoui, W Bensen, G Thomson, J Wade, P Quigley, J Eisenhoffer, Z Harsanyi, A C Darke

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Pain research & management. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
3.8field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 73 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Tramadol for osteoarthritis.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2019
    Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Trial
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Canadian family physician Medecin de famille canadien · 2018
    Article
  13. Will the new opioid guidelines harm more people than they help? Yes.Canadian family physician Medecin de famille canadien · 2018
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. PharmGKB summary: tramadol pathway.Pharmacogenetics and genomics · 2014
    Article
  17. Immunosuppressive effects of opioids--clinical relevance.Journal of neuroimmune pharmacology : the official journal of the Society on NeuroImmune Pharmacology · 2011
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Opioids in chronic musculoskeletal conditions.Therapeutic advances in musculoskeletal disease · 2010
    Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 7 institutions in 3 countries.

A D BeaulieuCentre de Rhumatologie St-Louis, Ste-Foy, Canada.
P M Peloso
B Haraoui
W Bensen
G Thomson
J Wade
P Quigley
J Eisenhoffer
Z Harsanyi
A C Darke
Purdue Pharma (Canada) · CACentre Hospitalier de l’Université de Montréal · CAHealth Decisions (United States) · USMcMaster University · CAMount Medical Centre · AUUniversity of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics · USUniversity of Manitoba · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe present study was a randomized, parallel, double-blind comparison between controlled-release (CR) tramadol and sustained-release (SR) diclofenac in patients with chronic pain due to osteoarthritis of the hips and/or knees.

methodsPatients with at least moderate pain intensity, and having received analgesics over the past three months, underwent a two- to seven-day washout of current analgesics before initiation of 200 mg CR tramadol or 75 mg SR diclofenac. During the eight-week study, patients returned to the clinic biweekly. CR tramadol doses were titrated to a maximum of 200 mg, 300 mg or 400 mg per day. SR diclofenac doses were titrated to 75 mg or 100 mg once daily, or 75 mg twice a day based on pain relief and the presence of side effects. For rescue analgesic, patients took acetaminophen as needed, up to 650 mg three times a day.

resultsForty-five patients on CR tramadol and 52 patients on SR diclofenac were evaluable. Significant improvements from prestudy treatment were shown for visual analogue scale pain (P=0.0001), stiffness (P<0.0005) and physical function (P=0.0001) scores for both treatments. There were no significant differences between the two treatments in the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities subscales, overall pain, pain and sleep, or the clinical effectiveness evaluation. Overall incidence of adverse events was similar in both groups, with more opioid-related adverse events with CR tramadol, and two serious adverse events occurring with the use of SR diclofenac.

conclusionsCR tramadol is as effective as SR diclofenac in the treatment of pain due to knee or hip osteoarthritis, with the potential for fewer of the serious side effects that characterize nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug administration.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAnalgesics, OpioidAnalysis of VarianceAnti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-SteroidalChronic DiseaseDiclofenacDose-Response Relationship, DrugDouble-Blind MethodDrug Administration ScheduleDrug EvaluationFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedOsteoarthritisAnalgesics, OpioidAnti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-SteroidalDiclofenacTramadol

Identifiers

PMID18443672
PMCPMC2671218
OpenAlexW129870784

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.