Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18443430›Full record

ArticleCancer biology & therapy2008

Remarkable enhancement of cytotoxicity of onconase and cepharanthine when used in combination on various tumor cell lines.

Masamichi Ita, H Dorota Halicka, Toshiki Tanaka, Akira Kurose, Barbara Ardelt, Kuslima Shogen, Zbigniew Darzynkiewicz

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer biology & therapy, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
5.2field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 47 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Pharmacological Activity of Cepharanthine.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Cepharanthine: An update of its mode of action, pharmacological properties and medical applications.Phytomedicine : international journal of phytotherapy and phytopharmacology · 2019
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Oncology letters · 2015
    Article
  11. Leczyme: a new candidate drug for cancer therapy.BioMed research international · 2014
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Ribonucleases as potential modalities in anticancer therapy.European journal of pharmacology · 2009
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Masamichi ItaBrander Cancer Research Institute and Department of Pathology, New York Medical College, Valhalla, New York 10595, USA.
H Dorota Halicka
Toshiki Tanaka
Akira Kurose
Barbara Ardelt
Kuslima Shogen
Zbigniew Darzynkiewicz
New York Medical College · US

Funding

PROBES FOR FLOW CYTOMETRYR01CA028704 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI DARZYNKIEWICZ, ZBIGNIEW · 1985 to 2014
$6.0M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA028704PHS HHS R01 28704
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Onconase (Onc), a ribonuclease from oocytes or early embryos of Northern Leopard frog (Rana pipiens), is cytostatic and cytotoxic to a variety of tumor lines in vitro, inhibits growth of tumors in animal in vivo models and is currently in Phase IIIb clinical trials for malignant mesothelioma where it displays antitumor activity with minor overall toxicity to the patient. One of the characteristic features of Onc is a synergism with a variety of other antitumor modalities. Cepharanthine (Cep), a biscoclaurine alkaloid from Stephania cepharantha Hayata, is widely used in Japan to treat variety of ailments. It also shows low toxicity to patients. The aim of the present study was to assess the interaction of these two drugs on different tumor cell lines. When human promyelocytic leukemia HL-60, histiomonocytic lymphoma U937, multiple myeloma RPMI-8228, prostate carcinoma DU 145 and prostate adenocarcinoma LNCaP cells were exposed to relatively low concentrations of Onc or Cep their growth rates were somewhat suppressed but the cells were still able to proliferate. Cell growth, however, was totally abolished in each of these cell lines when treated with Onc and Cep combined. The frequency of apoptosis was also many-fold higher in cultures treated with a combination of Onc and Cep than in respective cultures treated with Onc or Cep alone. The mechanism of the observed synergism is unclear but it may be associated with the Onc activity in targeting microRNAs and/or NFkappaB and Cep activity also targeting NFkappaB. The data suggest that the combination of these two drugs, that individually express a low toxic profile, may have strong antitumor potential.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsApoptosisBenzodioxolesBenzylisoquinolinesCell Line, TumorCell ProliferationCell SurvivalClinical Trials as TopicDrug SynergismHL-60 CellsHumansNF-kappa BRibonucleasesTime FactorsU937 CellsBenzodioxolesBenzylisoquinolinescepharanthineNF-kappa BranpirnaseRibonucleases

Identifiers

PMID18443430
PMCPMC2577768
OpenAlexW1972708630

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.