ReviewPlant physiology2008
The outlook for protein engineering in crop improvement.
Review in Plant physiology, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Breeding 5.0: Artificial intelligence (AI)-decoded germplasm for accelerated crop innovation.Journal of integrative plant biology · 2026Article
- Optimizing the thermostability of triketone dioxygenase for engineering tolerance to mesotrione herbicide in soybean and cotton.Frontiers in plant science · 2024Article
- Low-N protein engineering with data-efficient deep learning.Nature methods · 2021Article
- Genetic enhancement of Brassica napus seed quality.Transgenic research · 2014Review
- Expression, isolation, and purification of soluble and insoluble biotinylated proteins for nerve tissue regeneration.Journal of visualized experiments : JoVE · 2014Article
- Application of gene targeting to designed mutation breeding of high-tryptophan rice.Plant physiology · 2011Article
- Elevating optimal human nutrition to a central goal of plant breeding and production of plant-based foods.Plant science : an international journal of experimental plant biology · 2009Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.