ArticleBMC bioinformatics2008
Binning sequences using very sparse labels within a metagenome.
Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
32 citing papers in PubMed.
- Drug-drug interaction prediction: databases, web servers and computational models.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2023Review
- Improving metagenomic binning results with overlapped bins using assembly graphs.Algorithms for molecular biology : AMB · 2021Article
- A Puzzling Anomaly in the 4-Mer Composition of the Giant Pandoravirus Genomes Reveals a Stringent New Evolutionary Selection Process.Journal of virology · 2019Article
- A two-tiered unsupervised clustering approach for drug repositioning through heterogeneous data integration.BMC bioinformatics · 2018Article
- A clinician's guide to microbiome analysis.Nature reviews. Gastroenterology & hepatology · 2017Review
- Positive-Unlabeled Learning for inferring drug interactions based on heterogeneous attributes.BMC bioinformatics · 2017Article
- Cnidaria: fast, reference-free clustering of raw and assembled genome and transcriptome NGS data.BMC bioinformatics · 2015Article
- From cultured to uncultured genome sequences: metagenomics and modeling microbial ecosystems.Cellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS · 2015Review
- MBBC: an efficient approach for metagenomic binning based on clustering.BMC bioinformatics · 2015Article
- Metagenomics: tools and insights for analyzing next-generation sequencing data derived from biodiversity studies.Bioinformatics and biology insights · 2015Review
- Classification of metagenomics data at lower taxonomic level using a robust supervised classifier.Evolutionary bioinformatics online · 2015Article
- Article
- Reconstructing the genomic content of microbiome taxa through shotgun metagenomic deconvolution.PLoS computational biology · 2013Article
- The use of metagenomic approaches to analyze changes in microbial communities.Microbiology insights · 2013Review
- Current opportunities and challenges in microbial metagenome analysis--a bioinformatic perspective.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2012Review
- Separating metagenomic short reads into genomes via clustering.Algorithms for molecular biology : AMB · 2012Article
- Unsupervised discovery of microbial population structure within metagenomes using nucleotide base composition.Nucleic acids research · 2012Article
- Metagenomics - a guide from sampling to data analysis.Microbial informatics and experimentation · 2012Article
- Article
- Unsupervised two-way clustering of metagenomic sequences.Journal of biomedicine & biotechnology · 2012Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundIn metagenomic studies, a process called binning is necessary to assign contigs that belong to multiple species to their respective phylogenetic groups. Most of the current methods of binning, such as BLAST, k-mer and PhyloPythia, involve assigning sequence fragments by comparing sequence similarity or sequence composition with already-sequenced genomes that are still far from comprehensive. We propose a semi-supervised seeding method for binning that does not depend on knowledge of completed genomes. Instead, it extracts the flanking sequences of highly conserved 16S rRNA from the metagenome and uses them as seeds (labels) to assign other reads based on their compositional similarity.
resultsThe proposed seeding method is implemented on an unsupervised Growing Self-Organising Map (GSOM), and called Seeded GSOM (S-GSOM). We compared it with four well-known semi-supervised learning methods in a preliminary test, separating random-length prokaryotic sequence fragments sampled from the NCBI genome database. We identified the flanking sequences of the highly conserved 16S rRNA as suitable seeds that could be used to group the sequence fragments according to their species. S-GSOM showed superior performance compared to the semi-supervised methods tested. Additionally, S-GSOM may also be used to visually identify some species that do not have seeds. The proposed method was then applied to simulated metagenomic datasets using two different confidence threshold settings and compared with PhyloPythia, k-mer and BLAST. At the reference taxonomic level Order, S-GSOM outperformed all k-mer and BLAST results and showed comparable results with PhyloPythia for each of the corresponding confidence settings, where S-GSOM performed better than PhyloPythia in the >/= 10 reads datasets and comparable in the > or = 8 kb benchmark tests.
conclusionIn the task of binning using semi-supervised learning methods, results indicate S-GSOM to be the best of the methods tested. Most importantly, the proposed method does not require knowledge from known genomes and uses only very few labels (one per species is sufficient in most cases), which are extracted from the metagenome itself. These advantages make it a very attractive binning method. S-GSOM outperformed the binning methods that depend on already-sequenced genomes, and compares well to the current most advanced binning method, PhyloPythia.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.