Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18441119›Full record

ArticleApplied and environmental microbiology2008

Molecular analysis of the Enterobacter sakazakii O-antigen gene locus.

N Mullane, P O'Gaora, J E Nally, C Iversen, P Whyte, P G Wall, S Fanning

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Applied and environmental microbiology, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
4.3field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 82 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Analysis of the Molecular Diversity AmongFrontiers in microbiology · 2020
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. DNA-Sequence Based Typing of theFrontiers in microbiology · 2017
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

N MullaneCentres for Food Safety & Food-borne Zoonomics, UCD Veterinary Sciences Centre, University College Dublin, Belfield, Dublin 4, Ireland.
P O'Gaora
J E Nally
C Iversen
P Whyte
P G Wall
S Fanning
Conway School of Landscape Design · USUniversity College Dublin · IEUniversity of Zurich · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Nucleotide polymorphism associated with the O-antigen-encoding locus, rfb, in Enterobacter sakazakii was determined by PCR-restriction fragment length polymorphism analysis. Based on the analysis of these DNA profiles, 12 unique banding patterns were detected among a collection of 62 strains from diverse origins. Two common profiles were identified and were designated serotypes O:1 and O:2. DNA sequencing of the 12,500-bp region flanked by galF and gnd identified 11 open reading frames, all with the same transcriptional direction. Analysis of the proximal region of both sequences demonstrated remarkable heterogeneity. A PCR assay targeting genes specific for the two prominent serotypes was developed and applied for the identification of these strains recovered from food, environmental, and clinical samples.

Indexed as

Bacterial ProteinsCluster AnalysisCronobacter sakazakiiDNA, BacterialDNA FingerprintingEnterobacteriaceae InfectionsEnvironmental MicrobiologyFood MicrobiologyGene OrderGenotypeHumansMolecular Sequence DataO AntigensOpen Reading FramesPolymerase Chain ReactionPolymorphism, Restriction Fragment LengthBacterial ProteinsDNA, BacterialO Antigensrfb protein, Bacteria

Identifiers

PMID18441119
PMCPMC2446543
OpenAlexW1980795046

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.