Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18440652›Full record

ArticleImmunology letters2008

Search for potential target site of nucleocapsid gene for the design of an epitope-based SARS DNA vaccine.

Noton Kumar Dutta, Kaushiki Mazumdar, Byoung-Hee Lee, Min-Won Baek, Dong-Jae Kim, Yi-Rang Na, Sung-Hoon Park, Hyun-Kyoung Lee, Hiroaki Kariwa, Le Quynh Mai and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Immunology letters, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 30% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Development of SARS-CoV-2 Nucleocapsid Specific Monoclonal Antibodies.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2020
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. A review of vaccine development and research for industry animals in Korea.Clinical and experimental vaccine research · 2012
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Noton Kumar DuttaLaboratory Animal Medicine, College of Veterinary Medicine and KRF Zoonotic Disease Priority Research Institute, Seoul National University, Gwanak-Gu, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Kaushiki Mazumdar
Byoung-Hee Lee
Min-Won Baek
Dong-Jae Kim
Yi-Rang Na
Sung-Hoon Park
Hyun-Kyoung Lee
Hiroaki Kariwa
Le Quynh Mai
Jae-Hak Park
Seoul National University · KRHokkaido University · JPNational Institute Of Hygiene And Epidemiology · VN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

It is believed today that nucleocapsid protein (N) of severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS)-CoV is one of the most promising antigen candidates for vaccine design. In this study, three fragments [N1 (residues: 1-422); N2 (residues: 1-109); N3 (residues: 110-422)] of N protein of SARS-CoV were expressed in Escherichia coli and analyzed by pooled sera of convalescence phase of SARS patients. Three gene fragments [N1 (1-1269 nt), N2 (1-327 nt) and N3 (328-1269 nt)-expressing the same proteins of N1, N2 and N3, respectively] of SARS-N were cloned into pVAX-1 and used to immunize BALB/c mice by electroporation. Humoral (by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay, ELISA) and cellular (by cell proliferation and CD4(+):CD8(+) assay) immunity was detected by using recombinant N1 and N3 specific antigen. Results showed that N1 and N3 fragments of N protein expressed by E. coli were able to react with sera of SARS patients but N2 could not. Specific humoral and cellular immunity in mice could be induced significantly by inoculating SARS-CoV N1 and N3 DNA vaccine. In addition, the immune response levels in N3 were significantly higher for antibody responses (IgG and IgG1 but not IgG2a) and cell proliferation but not in CD4(+):CD8(+) assay compared to N1 vaccine. The identification of antigenic N protein fragments has implications to provide basic information for the design of DNA vaccine against SARS-CoV. The present results not only suggest that DNA immunization with pVax-N3 could be used as potential DNA vaccination approaches to induce antibody in BALB/c mice, but also illustrates that gene immunization with these SARS DNA vaccines can generate different immune responses.

Indexed as

AnimalsAntibodiesCell LineCell ProliferationEpitopesEscherichia coliFemaleHumansMiceMice, Inbred BALB CNucleocapsidSevere acute respiratory syndrome-related coronavirusT-LymphocytesVaccines, DNAViral VaccinesAntibodiesEpitopesVaccines, DNAViral Vaccines

Identifiers

PMID18440652
PMCPMC7112843
OpenAlexW2085724497

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.