Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18438724›Full record

ArticleClinical orthopaedics and related research2008

Molecular identification of bacteria from aseptically loose implants.

Naomi Kobayashi, Gary W Procop, Viktor Krebs, Hideo Kobayashi, Thomas W Bauer

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical orthopaedics and related research, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 38 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
38citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
6.1field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

38 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 87 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. PCR-based diagnosis of prosthetic joint infection.Journal of clinical microbiology · 2013
    Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Identification of Prosthetic Joint Infection Pathogens Using a Shotgun Metagenomics Approach.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2018
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Emperor's new clothes: Is particle disease really infected particle disease?Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society · 2016
    Review
  16. Multi-disciplinary antimicrobial strategies for improving orthopaedic implants to prevent prosthetic joint infections in hip and knee.Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society · 2016
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Molecular diagnostics.The Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons · 2015
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Naomi KobayashiDepartment of Anatomic Pathology, L25, The Cleveland Clinic Foundation, 9500 Euclid Avenue, Cleveland, OH 44195, USA.
Gary W Procop
Viktor Krebs
Hideo Kobayashi
Thomas W Bauer
Cleveland Clinic · USCleveland Foundation · USYokohama City University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

unlabelledPolymerase chain reaction (PCR) assays have been used to detect bacteria adherent to failed orthopaedic implants, but some PCR assays have had problems with probable false-positive results. We used a combination of a Staphylococcus species-specific PCR and a universal PCR followed by DNA sequencing to identify bacteria on implants retrieved from 52 patients (92 implants) at revision arthroplasty. We addressed two questions in this study: (1) Is this method able to show the existence of bacterial DNA on presumed aseptic loosed implants?; and (2) What proportion of presumed aseptic or culture-negative implants was positive for bacterial DNA by PCR? Fourteen implants (15%) were believed infected, whereas 74 implants (85%) were believed aseptic. Each implant was sonicated and the resulting solution was submitted for dual real-time PCR assay and culture. All implants believed aseptically loose were culture-negative, but nine of the 74 (12%) had bacterial DNA by PCR; two (2.7%) were PCR-positive and also showed histologic findings suggestive of infection. Uniquely developed PCR and bacterial sequencing assays showed bacterial DNA on 12% of implants removed for presumed aseptic loosening. Additional studies are needed to determine the clinical importance of bacterial DNA detected by PCR but not by conventional culture. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, diagnostic study.

Indexed as

Polymerase Chain ReactionProsthesis FailureArthroplasty, Replacement, HipArthroplasty, Replacement, KneeDevice RemovalHumansJoint ProsthesisReoperationStaphylococcal InfectionsStaphylococcus

Identifiers

PMID18438724
PMCPMC2505246
OpenAlexW2083787425

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.