Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18438723›Full record

ReviewPathology oncology research : POR2008

The role of radiotherapy in the conservative treatment of ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast.

Csaba Polgár, Zsuzsanna Kahán, Zsolt Orosz, Gabriella Gábor, Janaki Hadijev, Gábor Cserni, Janina Kulka, Nóra Jani, Zoltán Sulyok, György Lázár and 7 more

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Pathology oncology research : POR, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Csaba PolgárDepartment of Radiotherapy, National Institute of Oncology, Ráth Gy. u. 7-9., Budapest, 1122, Hungary. polgar@oncol.hu
Zsuzsanna Kahán
Zsolt Orosz
Gabriella Gábor
Janaki Hadijev
Gábor Cserni
Janina Kulka
Nóra Jani
Zoltán Sulyok
György Lázár
Gábor Boross
Csaba Diczházi
Eva Szabó
Zsolt László
Zoltán Péntek
Tibor Major
János Fodor
National Institute of Oncology · HUBács-Kiskun Megyei Kórház · HUSemmelweis University · HUUniversity of Szeged · HUUniversity of Kapsovar · HU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Breast-conserving surgery (BCS) followed by radiotherapy (RT) has become the standard of care for the treatment of early-stage (St. I-II) invasive breast carcinoma. However, controversy exists regarding the value of RT in the conservative treatment of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS). In this article we review the role of RT in the management of DCIS. Retrospective and prospective trials and meta-analyses published between 1975 and 2007 in the MEDLINE database, and recent issues of relevant journals/handbooks relating to DCIS, BCS and RT were searched for. In retrospective series (10,194 patients) the 10-year rate of local recurrence (LR) with and without RT was reported in the range of 9-28% and 22-54%, respectively. In four large randomised controlled trials (NSABP-B-17, EORTC-10853, UKCCCR, SweDCIS; 4,568 patients) 50 Gy whole-breast RT significantly decreased the 5-year LR rate from 16-22% (annual LR rate: 2.6-5.0%) to 7-10% (annual LR rate: 1.3-1.9%). In a recent meta-analysis of randomised trials the addition of RT to BCS resulted in a 60% risk reduction of both invasive and in situ recurrences. In a multicentre retrospective study, an additional dose of 10 Gy to the tumour bed yielded a further 55% risk reduction compared to RT without boost. To date, no subgroups have been reliably identified that do not benefit from RT after BCS. In the NSABP-B-24 trial, the addition of tamoxifen (TAM) to RT reduced ipsilateral (11.1% vs. 7.7%) and contralateral (4.9% vs. 2.3%) breast events significantly. In contrast, in the UKCCCR study, TAM produced no significant reduction in all breast events. Based on available evidence obtained from retrospective and prospective trials, all patients with DCIS have potential benefit from RT after BCS. Further prospective studies are warranted to identify subgroups of low-risk patients with DCIS for whom RT can be safely omitted. Until long-term results of ongoing studies on outcomes of patients treated with BCS alone (with or without TAM or aromatase inhibitors) are available, RT should be routinely recommended after BCS for all patients except those with contraindication.

Indexed as

Mastectomy, SegmentalBreastBreast NeoplasmsCarcinoma, Intraductal, NoninfiltratingClinical Trials as TopicCombined Modality TherapyFemaleHumansMeta-Analysis as Topic

Identifiers

PMID18438723
OpenAlexW2023837487

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.