ReviewClinics (Sao Paulo, Brazil)2008
Is brain banking of psychiatric cases valuable for neurobiological research?
Review in Clinics (Sao Paulo, Brazil), 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.
- Brain banking in the United States and Europe: Importance, challenges, and future trends.Journal of neuropathology and experimental neurology · 2024Article
- The Concept of an Epilepsy Brain Bank.Frontiers in neurology · 2020Review
- Brain Banks Spur New Frontiers in Neuropsychiatric Research and Strategies for Analysis and Validation.Genomics, proteomics & bioinformatics · 2019Review
- Identification of novel circulatory microRNA signatures linked to patients with ischemic stroke.Human molecular genetics · 2018Article
- Stroke, Vascular Dementia, and Alzheimer's Disease: Molecular Links.Journal of Alzheimer's disease : JAD · 2016Review
- The NSW brain tissue resource centre: Banking for alcohol and major neuropsychiatric disorders research.Alcohol (Fayetteville, N.Y.) · 2016Article
- Human dermal fibroblasts in psychiatry research.Neuroscience · 2016Review
- The neurobiology of suicide - A Review of post-mortem studies.Journal of molecular psychiatry · 2013Review
- Turner syndrome and sexual differentiation of the brain: implications for understanding male-biased neurodevelopmental disorders.Journal of neurodevelopmental disorders · 2011Article
- Psychiatric brain banking: three perspectives on current trends and future directions.Biological psychiatry · 2011Review
- Schizophrenia genomics and proteomics: are we any closer to biomarker discovery?Behavioral and brain functions : BBF · 2009Article
- The importance of brain banks for molecular neuropathological research: The New South Wales Tissue Resource Centre experience.International journal of molecular sciences · 2009Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
It is widely accepted that neurobiological abnormalities underlie the symptoms of psychiatric disorders such as schizophrenia and unipolar or bipolar affective disorders. New molecular methods, computer-assisted quantification techniques and neurobiological investigation methods that can be applied to the human brain are all used in post-mortem investigations of psychiatric disorders. The following article describes modern quantitative methods and recent post-mortem findings in schizophrenia and affective disorders. Using our brain bank as an example, necessary considerations of modern brain banking are addressed such as ethical considerations, clinical work-up, preparation techniques and the organization of a brain bank, the value of modern brain banking for investigations of psychiatric disorders is summarized.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.