ArticleBulletin of the World Health Organization2008
Revisiting Wilson and Jungner in the genomic age: a review of screening criteria over the past 40 years.
Article in Bulletin of the World Health Organization, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 366 papers, 12 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
366 citing papers in PubMed, 12 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Global prevalence of nocturnal hypertension: systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC public health · 2026Pooled it
- American College of Rheumatology Guidance Statements for Addressing Mental Health Concerns in Youth With Pediatric Rheumatologic Diseases.Arthritis care & research · 2025Guideline
- Quality measures of two-stage newborn hearing screening: systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in public health · 2025Pooled it
- Pooled it
- Effectiveness of universal newborn hearing screening: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Journal of global health · 2022Pooled it
- Guaiac-based faecal occult blood tests versus faecal immunochemical tests for colorectal cancer screening in average-risk individuals.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2022Pooled it
- Receiving results of uncertain clinical relevance from population genetic screening: systematic review & meta-synthesis of qualitative research.European journal of human genetics : EJHG · 2022Pooled it
- Principles of Genomic Newborn Screening Programs: A Systematic Review.JAMA network open · 2021Pooled it
- National Data Analysis and Systematic Review for Human Resources for Cervical Cancer Screening in Japan.Asian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP · 2021Pooled it
- Acceptability of childhood screening: a systematic narrative review.Public health · 2021Pooled it
- Antenatal screening practices in the WHO European Region: a mixed methods study.Journal of global health · 2020Pooled it
- Long-term cardiometabolic disease risk in women with PCOS: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Human reproduction update · 2020Pooled it
- Laboratory diagnostics in personalised medicine - 36th Symposium of the Croatian society of medical biochemistry and laboratory medicine.Biochemia medica · 2026Review
- Healthcare professionals' views on expanding newborn screening with or without genomics in France: Results of the SeDeN-p2 study.European journal of human genetics : EJHG · 2026Article
- Defining and Measuring Cognitive Decline and Clinical Relevance.Neurology and therapy · 2026Review
- Considering seriousness in preconception carrier screening: a framework to support policy deliberation.Journal of community genetics · 2026Review
- The cost-benefit of newborn screening for X-linked agammaglobulinemia and related B-cell lymphopenia.Immunologic research · 2026Review
- Mucopolysaccharidosis Type II Screening, Diagnosis, and Management: A Literature Review and Practical Recommendations for Newborn Screening Programs and Health Care Providers to Support Families and Improve Outcomes.International journal of neonatal screening · 2026Review
- Ongoing and completed clinical trials on prostate cancer screening using MRI.European radiology · 2026Review
- Attitudes Toward Sex-Specific Versus Universal Newborn Screening for X-Linked Adrenoleukodystrophy in Hong Kong.International journal of neonatal screening · 2026Article
306 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.