ArticleCanadian respiratory journal2008
Use of the Airway Questionnaire 20 to detect changes in quality of life in asthmatic patients and its association with the St George's Respiratory Questionnaire and clinical parameters.
Article in Canadian respiratory journal, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Daily physical activity and lung function decline in adult-onset asthma: a 12-year follow-up study.European clinical respiratory journal · 2018Article
- Utility of brief questionnaires of health-related quality of life (Airways Questionnaire 20 and Clinical COPD Questionnaire) to predict exacerbations in patients with asthma and COPD.Health and quality of life outcomes · 2013Article
- Asthma outcomes: quality of life.The Journal of allergy and clinical immunology · 2012Review
- Validation of a Spanish version of the Airways Questionnaire 20: a short and simple instrument.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2010Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND
objectivesThe usefulness of the Airway Questionnaire 20 (AQ20) -- a short version of the St George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) -- to evaluate quality of life (QOL) in asthmatic patients following a hospital admission was assessed.
methodsAt baseline and at six months following the index admission, 135 asthmatic patients were asked to complete the AQ20 and the SGRQ. The patient's peak flow, number of subsequent asthma exacerbations and number of repeat hospital admissions were also recorded.
resultsThe AQ20 scores ranged from 0 to 20, with a high score indicating poor QOL. The AQ20 had good coverage, with no obvious ceiling or floor effects. In multiple regression analysis, all three SGRQ components were important in predicting AQ20 scores (R(2) values were 61.9% and 73.1% for baseline and six-month scores, respectively). The AQ20 was closely correlated with the SGRQ, but not redundant when used together. Bias was low when the retest reliability of the AQ20 was evaluated using the Bland-Altman method, but variation was high (-0.64). Patients with subsequent exacerbations (n=52) had higher AQ20 scores at six-month follow-up (P=0.002). In logistic regression, the AQ20 score was closely associated with the incidence of exacerbations (OR 1.15, 95% CI 1.05 to 1.25), with a similar magnitude of association between the AQ20 and the SGRQ. The AQ20 score did not correlate with peak flow at baseline (r=-0.05; P=0.573) or at six months (r=-0.31; P=0.006), and was not responsive to changes in peak flow (r=-0.06; P=0.583).
conclusionThe AQ20 can be substituted for the more complicated SGRQ in the assessment of QOL in patients following a hospital admission for an asthma exacerbation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.