Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18436918›Full record

ArticleBMJ (Clinical research ed.)2008

Inequity of access to investigation and effect on clinical outcomes: prognostic study of coronary angiography for suspected stable angina pectoris.

Neha Sekhri, Adam Timmis, Ruoling Chen, Cornelia Junghans, Niamh Walsh, M Justin Zaman, Justin Zaman, Sandra Eldridge, Harry Hemingway, Gene Feder

Erratum issuedAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ (Clinical research ed.), 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 21 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Influences of socioeconomic deprivation on GPs' decisions to refer patients to cardiology: a qualitative study.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2018
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. South Asians and coronary heart disease: always bad news?The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2011
    Article
  15. Angina in women.Current cardiology reports · 2010
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Women and ischemic heart disease: evolving knowledge.Journal of the American College of Cardiology · 2009 · on this map
    Review
  19. Presentation of stable angina pectoris among women and South Asian people.CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne · 2008
    Article
  20. Universality, equity, and quality of care.BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 2008
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

  • Erratum issued
    Zaman, Justin [corrected to Zaman, M Justin].
5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Neha SekhriCardiac Directorate, Barts and the London NHS Trust, London.
Adam Timmis
Ruoling Chen
Cornelia Junghans
Niamh Walsh
M Justin Zaman
Justin Zaman
Sandra Eldridge
Harry Hemingway
Gene Feder

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo determine whether coronary angiography for suspected stable angina pectoris is underused in older patients, women, south Asian patients, and those from socioeconomically deprived areas, and, if it is, whether this is associated with higher coronary event rates.

designMulticentre cohort with five year follow-up.

settingSix ambulatory care clinics in England.

participants1375 consecutive patients in whom coronary angiography was individually rated as appropriate with the Rand consensus method.

main outcome measuresReceipt of angiography (420 procedures); coronary mortality and acute coronary syndrome events.

resultsIn a multivariable analysis, angiography was less likely to be performed in patients aged over 64 compared with those aged under 50 (hazard ratio 0.60, 95% confidence interval 0.38 to 0.96), women compared with men (0.42, 0.35 to 0.50), south Asians compared with white people (0.48, 0.34 to 0.67), and patients in the most deprived fifth compared with the other four fifths (0.66, 0.40 to 1.08). Not undergoing angiography when it was deemed appropriate was associated with higher rates of coronary event.

conclusionsAt an early stage after presentation with suspected angina, coronary angiography is underused in older people, women, south Asians, and people from deprived areas. Not receiving appropriate angiography was associated with a higher risk of coronary events in all groups. Interventions based on clinical guidance that supports individualised management decisions might improve access and outcomes.

Indexed as

Health Services AccessibilityAdultAgedAngina PectorisCohort StudiesCoronary AngiographyEnglandFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPrognosisRisk Factors

Identifiers

PMID18436918
PMCPMC2376033

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.