Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18435804›Full record

ReviewClinical and experimental immunology2008

Establishing humanized mice using stem cells: maximizing the potential.

D Bernard, M Peakman, A C Hayday

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Clinical and experimental immunology, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Humanized Mouse Model of HIV Infection.Bulletin of experimental biology and medicine · 2023
    Article
  5. Advances in Research of Adult Gliomas.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Application of Humanized Mice in Immunological Research.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2016
    Review
  9. Host specificity of bacterial pathogens.Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in medicine · 2013
    Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

D BernardKing's College London, Department of Immunobiology, London, UK.
M Peakman
A C Hayday

Funding

Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Studies on physiology and pathology as they relate to the immune system draw heavily upon rodent models. With the increasing impetus provided by initiatives in translational medicine, the demand for ever more sophisticated, 'humanized' murine models is greater than ever. However, the design and implementation of studies in such mice is far from trivial. Here we provide a technical perspective on the increasing interest in developing humanized mice. We give examples of primary data starting with the routine procurement of human donor material, through CD34(+) cell purification prior to engraftment to injection into immunocompromised mice. Our goal is to provide practical advice to the many investigators who may be commencing or considering such studies.

Indexed as

Disease Models, AnimalAnimalsAntigens, CD34Cell SeparationHematopoietic Stem Cell TransplantationHumansMiceMice, SCIDTransplantation, HeterologousAntigens, CD34

Identifiers

PMID18435804
PMCPMC2453213

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.