Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18433746›Full record

ArticleExperimental neurology2008

Axotomy or compression is required for axonal sprouting following end-to-side neurorrhaphy.

Ayato Hayashi, Christopher Pannucci, Arash Moradzadeh, David Kawamura, Christina Magill, Daniel A Hunter, Alice Y Tong, Alexander Parsadanian, Susan E Mackinnon, Terence M Myckatyn

Open access · greenAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Experimental neurology, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 100 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. End-to-Side vs. Free Graft Nerve Reconstruction-Experimental Study on Rats.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Journal of hand and microsurgery · 2022
    Article
  7. Observational
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Hand reanimation.Current reviews in musculoskeletal medicine · 2014
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Ayato HayashiDivision of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, Campus Box 8238, 660 South Euclid Ave., St. Louis, MO 63110, USA.
Christopher Pannucci
Arash Moradzadeh
David Kawamura
Christina Magill
Daniel A Hunter
Alice Y Tong
Alexander Parsadanian
Susan E Mackinnon
Terence M Myckatyn
Washington University in St. Louis · USHope Center for Neurological Disorders · US

Funding

THE EFFECTS OF GDNF ON PERIPHERAL NERVE REGENERATIONR01NS051706 · NINDS · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI MACKINNON, SUSAN E, SAKIYAMA-ELBERT, SHELLY ELESE · 2006 to 2016
$4.0M
NINDS NIH HHS 5R01NS051706-02NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS051706
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

End-to-side (ETS) nerve repair remains an area of intense scrutiny for peripheral nerve surgeon-scientists. In this technique, the transected end of an injured nerve, representing the "recipient" is sutured to the side of an uninjured "donor" nerve. Some works suggest that the recipient limb is repopulated with regenerating collateral axonal sprouts from the donor nerve that go on to form functional synapses. Significant, unresolved questions include whether the donor nerve needs to be injured to facilitate regeneration, and whether a single donor neuron is capable of projecting additional axons capable of differentially innervating disparate targets. We serially imaged living transgenic mice (n=66) expressing spectral variants of GFP in various neuronal subsets after undergoing previously described atraumatic, compressive, or epineurotomy forms of ETS repair (n=22 per group). To evaluate the source, and target innervation of these regenerating axons, nerve morphometry and retrograde labeling were further supplemented by confocal microscopy as well as Western blot analysis. Either compression or epineurotomy with inevitable axotomy were required to facilitate axonal regeneration into the recipient limb. Progressively more injurious models were associated with improved recipient nerve reinnervation (epineurotomy: 184+/-57.6 myelinated axons; compression: 78.9+/-13.8; atraumatic: 0), increased Schwann cell proliferation (epineurotomy: 72.2% increase; compression: 39% increase) and cAMP response-element binding protein expression at the expense of a net deficit in donor axon counts distal to the repair. These differences were manifest by 150 days, at which point quantitative evidence for pruning was obtained. We conclude that ETS repair relies upon injury to the donor nerve.

Indexed as

AnimalsAxonsAxotomyMiceMice, Inbred C57BLMice, TransgenicMicrosurgeryNerve CrushNerve RegenerationNeurosurgical ProceduresTissue Transplantation

Identifiers

PMID18433746
PMCPMC2761726
OpenAlexW2057611119

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.