Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18433645›Full record

ReviewMethods in enzymology2008

Analysis of nitric oxide-dependent antimicrobial actions in macrophages and mice.

Andrés Vazquez-Torres, Tania Stevanin, Jessica Jones-Carson, Margaret Castor, Robert C Read, Ferric C Fang

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Methods in enzymology, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
14.4field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 39 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Survival ofMicroorganisms · 2022
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Autophagy Induction by a Small Molecule InhibitsAntimicrobial agents and chemotherapy · 2019
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Andrés Vazquez-TorresUniversity of Colorado Health Sciences Center, Aurora, Colorado, USA.
Tania Stevanin
Jessica Jones-Carson
Margaret Castor
Robert C Read
Ferric C Fang
University of Colorado Health · USUniversity of Sheffield · GBUniversity of Washington · US

Funding

NITRIC OXIDE CYTOTOXICITY IN SALMONELLOSISR01AI039557 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI FANG, FERRIC C · 1997 to 2012
$4.1M
DNA DAMAGE AND REPAIR IN SALMONELLA PATHOGENESISR01AI050660 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI FANG, FERRIC C · 2003 to 2007
$1.9M
NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI039557NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI050660
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Nitric oxide (NO*) is a critical component of mammalian host defense that is produced in macrophages and other cells comprising the innate immune system. Isolated mammalian macrophages have been utilized to measure the kinetics of NO production and to demonstrate NO-related antimicrobial actions. Some microorganisms possess enzymes to detoxify nitrogen oxides, and mutant strains lacking these enzymes can be used to demonstrate the importance of these mechanisms for intracellular bacterial survival. This chapter describes techniques with which to analyze the antimicrobial actions of nitric oxide in murine and human macrophages and in laboratory mice.

Indexed as

AnimalsAnti-Infective AgentsHumansMacrophage ActivationMacrophagesMiceMice, KnockoutMicrobial Sensitivity TestsMicrobial ViabilityNitric OxideNitric Oxide Synthase Type IISalmonella entericaSalmonella Infections, AnimalAnti-Infective AgentsNitric OxideNitric Oxide Synthase Type II

Identifiers

PMID18433645
PMCPMC2704381
OpenAlexW1589472678

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.