Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18433471›Full record

ArticleBMC bioinformatics2008

Conserved co-expression for candidate disease gene prioritization.

Martin Oti, Jeroen van Reeuwijk, Martijn A Huynen, Han G Brunner

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Genes, behavior and next-generation RNA sequencing.Genes, brain, and behavior · 2013
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Gene networks and haloperidol-induced catalepsy.Genes, brain, and behavior · 2012
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Application of genetic/genomic approaches to allergic disorders.The Journal of allergy and clinical immunology · 2010
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Network-based Identification of novel cancer genes.Molecular & cellular proteomics : MCP · 2010
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Martin OtiCentre for Molecular and Biomolecular Informatics, Nijmegen Centre for Molecular Life Sciences, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre, Geert Grooteplein 26-28, 6525 GA, Nijmegen, The Netherlands. m.oti@cmbi.ru.nl
Jeroen van Reeuwijk
Martijn A Huynen
Han G Brunner

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundGenes that are co-expressed tend to be involved in the same biological process. However, co-expression is not a very reliable predictor of functional links between genes. The evolutionary conservation of co-expression between species can be used to predict protein function more reliably than co-expression in a single species. Here we examine whether co-expression across multiple species is also a better prioritizer of disease genes than is co-expression between human genes alone.

resultsWe use co-expression data from yeast (S. cerevisiae), nematode worm (C. elegans), fruit fly (D. melanogaster), mouse and human and find that the use of evolutionary conservation can indeed improve the predictive value of co-expression. The effect that genes causing the same disease have higher co-expression than do other genes from their associated disease loci, is significantly enhanced when co-expression data are combined across evolutionarily distant species. We also find that performance can vary significantly depending on the co-expression datasets used, and just using more data does not necessarily lead to better prioritization. Instead, we find that dataset quality is more important than quantity, and using a consistent microarray platform per species leads to better performance than using more inclusive datasets pooled from various platforms.

conclusionWe find that evolutionarily conserved gene co-expression prioritizes disease candidate genes better than human gene co-expression alone, and provide the integrated data as a new resource for disease gene prioritization tools.

Indexed as

Conserved SequenceGenetic Predisposition to DiseasePenetranceAnimalsBase SequenceCaenorhabditis elegansDatabases, GeneticDiseaseDrosophila melanogasterEvolution, MolecularGene DosageGene ExpressionGene Expression ProfilingGene FrequencyHumansMice

Identifiers

PMID18433471
PMCPMC2383918

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.