ArticleBMC bioinformatics2008
Extraction of semantic biomedical relations from text using conditional random fields.
Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 72 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
72 citing papers in PubMed.
- Pathway Analysis and Genetic Markers in Parkinson's Disease: Insights into Subtype-Specific Mechanisms.Molecular neurobiology · 2025Article
- Effects of Molecular Crowding on the Structure, Folding, and Stability of DNA.Sub-cellular biochemistry · 2025Review
- Synthetic4Health: generating annotated synthetic clinical letters.Frontiers in digital health · 2025Article
- Multiple-Wave Admixture and Adaptive Evolution of the Pamirian Wakhi People.Molecular biology and evolution · 2024Article
- AlzGenPred - CatBoost-based gene classifier for predicting Alzheimer's disease using high-throughput sequencing data.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Network Cluster Analysis of PPI and Phenotype Ontology for Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus.Iranian journal of biotechnology · 2024Article
- Building a large gene expression-cancer knowledge base with limited human annotations.Database : the journal of biological databases and curation · 2023Article
- XGDAG: explainable gene-disease associations via graph neural networks.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2023Article
- NIAPU: network-informed adaptive positive-unlabeled learning for disease gene identification.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2023Article
- GWAS Central: an expanding resource for finding and visualising genotype and phenotype data from genome-wide association studies.Nucleic acids research · 2023Article
- Chemical named entity recognition in the texts of scientific publications using the naïve Bayes classifier approach.Journal of cheminformatics · 2022Article
- TBGA: a large-scale Gene-Disease Association dataset for Biomedical Relation Extraction.BMC bioinformatics · 2022Article
- Text Mining for Building Biomedical Networks Using Cancer as a Case Study.Biomolecules · 2021Review
- RENET2: high-performance full-text gene-disease relation extraction with iterative training data expansion.NAR genomics and bioinformatics · 2021Article
- TrendyGenes, a computational pipeline for the detection of literature trends in academia and drug discovery.Scientific reports · 2021Article
- PCOSKBScientific reports · 2020Article
- CoCoScore: context-aware co-occurrence scoring for text mining applications using distant supervision.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2020Article
- Named Entity Recognition and Relation Detection for Biomedical Information Extraction.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2020Review
- Identification of infectious disease-associated host genes using machine learning techniques.BMC bioinformatics · 2019Article
- Automated Detection of Measurements and Their Descriptors in Radiology Reports Using a Hybrid Natural Language Processing Algorithm.Journal of digital imaging · 2019Article
12 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe increasing amount of published literature in biomedicine represents an immense source of knowledge, which can only efficiently be accessed by a new generation of automated information extraction tools. Named entity recognition of well-defined objects, such as genes or proteins, has achieved a sufficient level of maturity such that it can form the basis for the next step: the extraction of relations that exist between the recognized entities. Whereas most early work focused on the mere detection of relations, the classification of the type of relation is also of great importance and this is the focus of this work. In this paper we describe an approach that extracts both the existence of a relation and its type. Our work is based on Conditional Random Fields, which have been applied with much success to the task of named entity recognition.
resultsWe benchmark our approach on two different tasks. The first task is the identification of semantic relations between diseases and treatments. The available data set consists of manually annotated PubMed abstracts. The second task is the identification of relations between genes and diseases from a set of concise phrases, so-called GeneRIF (Gene Reference Into Function) phrases. In our experimental setting, we do not assume that the entities are given, as is often the case in previous relation extraction work. Rather the extraction of the entities is solved as a subproblem. Compared with other state-of-the-art approaches, we achieve very competitive results on both data sets. To demonstrate the scalability of our solution, we apply our approach to the complete human GeneRIF database. The resulting gene-disease network contains 34758 semantic associations between 4939 genes and 1745 diseases. The gene-disease network is publicly available as a machine-readable RDF graph.
conclusionWe extend the framework of Conditional Random Fields towards the annotation of semantic relations from text and apply it to the biomedical domain. Our approach is based on a rich set of textual features and achieves a performance that is competitive to leading approaches. The model is quite general and can be extended to handle arbitrary biological entities and relation types. The resulting gene-disease network shows that the GeneRIF database provides a rich knowledge source for text mining. Current work is focused on improving the accuracy of detection of entities as well as entity boundaries, which will also greatly improve the relation extraction performance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.