Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18432315›Full record

ArticleMolecular vision2008

Cone and rod cells have different target preferences in vitro as revealed by optical tweezers.

Robert J Clarke, Kormákur Högnason, Michael Brimacombe, Ellen Townes-Anderson

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular vision, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 35% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Optical Tweezers Exploring Neuroscience.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2020
    Review
  4. Sema3A Reduces Sprouting of Adult Rod Photoreceptors In Vitro.Investigative ophthalmology & visual science · 2017
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Using Laser Tweezers For Manipulating Isolated Neurons In Vitro.Journal of visualized experiments : JoVE · 2008
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Robert J ClarkeDepartment of Neurology and Neuroscience, New Jersey Medical School, University of Medicine and Dentistry of New Jersey, Newark, NJ 07103, USA.
Kormákur Högnason
Michael Brimacombe
Ellen Townes-Anderson
Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey · US

Funding

PLASTICITY AND REGENERATION OF RETINAL SYNAPSESR01EY012031 · NEI · UNIV OF MED/DENT OF NJ-NJ MEDICAL SCHOOL · PI TOWNES-ANDERSON, ELLEN S · 1998 to 2010
$3.1M
NEI NIH HHS EY012031NEI NIH HHS R01 EY012031
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeWhen neural circuits are damaged in adulthood, regenerating and sprouting processes must distinguish appropriate targets to recreate the normal circuitry. We tested the ability of adult nerve cells to target specific cells in culture using the retina as a model system.

methodsUnder sterile culture conditions, retinal cells, isolated from tiger salamander retina, were micromanipulated with optical tweezers to create pairs of first-order photoreceptor cells with second- or third-order retinal neurons. The development of cell contact and presynaptic varicosities, the direction and amount of neuritic growth, and nerve cell polarity were assessed after seven days in vitro. Cultures were labeled for rod opsin to distinguish rod from cone cells and for the alpha subunit of the trimeric G protein Go (Go alpha) to identify cone-dominated and mixed rod-cone ON bipolar cells.

resultsQuantitative analysis of growth demonstrated that target preferences were cell-specific: Cone cells preferred second-order bipolar cells, whereas rod cells grew toward third-order neurons, which include amacrine and ganglion cells. In addition, when rod cells grew toward bipolar cells, they chose an abnormally high number of Go alpha-positive bipolar cells. These growth patterns were not affected by tweezers manipulation or the amount of growth. Cell orientation of the photoreceptor also did not affect preferences: Cells oriented away from dendritic processes could reorient their axonal pole toward the target cell.

conclusionsCone cells preferred normal partners, and rod cells preferred novel partners. These intrinsic preferences indicate that adult nerve cells can have differing capacities for targeting even if they come from the same cell class. Further,these differences may help explain the patterns of photoreceptor sprouting seen in retinal degeneration in which rod, but not cone, cells invade the inner retinal layers where third-order neurons are located.

Indexed as

Optical TweezersAnimalsCaudataCell CommunicationCell MovementCell PolarityCells, CulturedPhotoreceptor Cells, VertebrateRetinal Bipolar CellsRetinal Cone Photoreceptor CellsRetinal Rod Photoreceptor Cells

Identifiers

PMID18432315
PMCPMC2383278
OpenAlexW2164835517

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.