Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18430415›Full record

ArticleDevelopmental biology2008

Control of cell cycle timing during C. elegans embryogenesis.

Zhirong Bao, Zhongying Zhao, Thomas J Boyle, John I Murray, Robert H Waterston

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Developmental biology, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 47 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
47citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

47 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Transcriptomic profiling of the embryonicbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Embryonic Development of Caenorhabditis elegans Sense Organs.The Journal of comparative neurology · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Analysis of developmental gene expression using smFISH andbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. A spatiotemporally resolved atlas of mRNA decay in thebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Systematic analysis of cell morphodynamics inFrontiers in bioinformatics · 2023
    Article
  16. Initial characterization of gap phase introduction in every cell cycle ofFrontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2022
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Maps of variability in cell lineage trees.PLoS computational biology · 2019
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Zhirong BaoDepartment of Genome Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195, USA. baoz@mskcc.org
Zhongying Zhao
Thomas J Boyle
John I Murray
Robert H Waterston

Funding

Automated single-cell expression analysis in C. elegansR01GM072675 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI WATERSTON, ROBERT H · 2005 to 2017
$7.1M
Automated single-cell gene expression and phenotype analysis in C. elegansK99HG004643 · NHGRI · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI BAO, ZHIRONG · 2007 to 2007
$99k
NHGRI NIH HHS K99 HG004643NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM072675
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

As a fundamental process of development, cell proliferation must be coordinated with other processes such as fate differentiation. Through statistical analysis of individual cell cycle lengths of the first 8 out of 10 rounds of embryonic cell division in Caenorhabditis elegans, we identified synchronous and invariantly ordered divisions that are tightly associated with fate differentiation. Our results suggest a three-tier model for fate control of cell cycle pace: the primary control of cell cycle pace is established by lineage and the founder cell fate, then fine-tuned by tissue and organ differentiation within each lineage, then further modified by individualization of cells as they acquire unique morphological and physiological roles in the variant body plan. We then set out to identify the pace-setting mechanisms in different fates. Our results suggest that ubiquitin-mediated degradation of CDC-25.1 is a rate-determining step for the E (gut) and P(3) (muscle and germline) lineages but not others, even though CDC-25.1 and its apparent decay have been detected in all lineages. Our results demonstrate the power of C. elegans embryogenesis as a model to dissect the interaction between differentiation and proliferation, and an effective approach combining genetic and statistical analysis at single-cell resolution.

Indexed as

AnimalsCaenorhabditis elegansCaenorhabditis elegans Proteinscdc25 PhosphatasesCell CycleCell DifferentiationCell LineageEmbryonic DevelopmentFemaleCaenorhabditis elegans Proteinscdc25 Phosphatases

Identifiers

PMID18430415
PMCPMC2442716

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.