Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18430229›Full record

SynthesisBMC complementary and alternative medicine2008

A systematic review of the clinical effectiveness of acupuncture for allergic rhinitis.

Jonathan Roberts, Aarnoud Huissoon, Janine Dretzke, Dechao Wang, Christopher Hyde

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMC complementary and alternative medicine, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. A Bibliometric Analysis of Chinese Medicine for Allergic Rhinitis.Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare · 2025
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Effects of low level laser therapy on ovalbumin-induced mouse model of allergic rhinitis.Evidence-based complementary and alternative medicine : eCAM · 2013
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Common respiratory diseases.Primary care · 2010
    Review
  14. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Jonathan RobertsWest Midlands Health Technology Assessment Collaboration, Department of Public Health and Epidemiology, University of Birmingham, UK. jonathan.roberts@hpa.org.uk
Aarnoud Huissoon
Janine Dretzke
Dechao Wang
Christopher Hyde

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAllergies cause a considerable burden to both sufferers and the National Health Service. There is growing interest in acupuncture as a treatment for a range of conditions. Since acupuncture may modulate the immune system it could be a useful treatment for allergic rhinitis (AR) sufferers. We therefore assessed the evidence for the clinical effectiveness of acupuncture in patients with AR by performing a systematic review of the literature.

methodsSearches (to 2007) were conducted in all major databases for randomised controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating the clinical effectiveness of acupuncture in the treatment of AR. No limits were placed on language. Studies were included if they compared acupuncture to a sham or inactive acupuncture treatment (placebo) with or without standard care. Meta-analysis was performed where feasible.

resultsSeven relevant RCTs were included after screening and application of inclusion and exclusion criteria. The trials were generally of poor quality as assessed by a modified Jadad scale, with the exception of two studies which scored highly. A wide variety of outcomes was measured but most assessed symptom severity on a visual analogue scale. A meta-analysis failed to show any summary benefits of acupuncture treatment for symptom severity scores or serum IgE measures which could not have been accounted for by chance alone. Acupuncture was not associated with any additional adverse events in the trials.

conclusionThere is currently insufficient evidence to support or refute the use of acupuncture in patients with AR. A large well conducted RCT, which overcomes identified methodological problems in the existing RCTs, would be required to resolve this question.

Indexed as

Randomized Controlled Trials as TopicAcupuncture PointsAcupuncture TherapyEvidence-Based MedicineHumansPain MeasurementResearch DesignRhinitis, Allergic, PerennialRhinitis, Allergic, SeasonalSeverity of Illness IndexTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID18430229
PMCPMC2386775

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.