Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18427843›Full record

SynthesisEuropean spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society2008

Clinimetric evaluation of active range of motion measures in patients with non-specific neck pain: a systematic review.

Chantal H P de Koning, Sylvia P van den Heuvel, J Bart Staal, Bouwien C M Smits-Engelsman, Erik J M Hendriks

4 registry-linked trialsOpen access · hybridAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 4 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 48 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
48citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
6.9field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03683602 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2011, after this paper: background citation

Effect of Chosen Treatment Methods on Pain, ROM, Associated Symptoms and Functioning in Patients With Cervical Spine Osteoarthritis: Randomised Control Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorJagiellonian UniversityRan2011 to 2014Enrolled80ConditionsCervical Spine OsteophyteArmsPNF group, manual therapy group
NCT03745469 completednot on this mapstarted 2018, after this paper: background citation

Effects of Smartphone Usage Duration on Neck Dysfunction in Young Versus Middle Aged Patients With Chronic Mechanical Neck Pain

TypeobservationalSponsorAliaa Rehan YoussefRan2018 to 2019Enrolled80ConditionsNeck Pain, Cervical PainArmsSmartphone
NCT07267507 active not recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

Accessory Movements and Associated Factors During Active Cervical Range of Motion

Typeobservational_patient_registrySponsorAtılım UniversityRan2024 to 2026Enrolled180ConditionsAsymptomatic Condition, Neck Pain
NCT07725861 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

Effects of Strain Counter Strain With and Without Sustained Natural Aphophyseal Glide on Pain Range Of Motion ,Craniovertebral Angle and Disability in Patients With Non Specific Neck Pain

TypeinterventionalSponsorRiphah International UniversityRan2026 to 2026Enrolled68ConditionsCervical PainArmsStrain Counterstrain + SNAG with Common Treatment, Strain Counterstain (SCS) only
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

48 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 177 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Validation of a novel sham cervical manipulation procedure.The spine journal : official journal of the North American Spine Society · 2012
    Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Chantal H P de KoningAvans+, University for Professionals, Breda, The Netherlands. cdekoning@zeelandnet.nl
Sylvia P van den Heuvel
J Bart Staal
Bouwien C M Smits-Engelsman
Erik J M Hendriks
Avans University of Applied Sciences · NLMaastricht University · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The study is to provide a critical analysis of the research literature on clinimetric properties of instruments that can be used in daily practice to measure active cervical range of motion (ACROM) in patients with non-specific neck pain. A computerized literature search was performed in Medline, Cinahl and Embase from 1982 to January 2007. Two reviewers independently assessed the clinimetric properties of identified instruments using a criteria list. The search identified a total of 33 studies, investigating three different types of measurement instruments to determine ACROM. These instruments were: (1) different types of goniometers/inclinometers, (2) visual estimation, and (3) tape measurements. Intra- and inter-observer reliability was demonstrated for the cervical range of motion instrument (CROM), Cybex electronic digital instrument (EDI-320) and a single inclinometer. The presence of agreement was assessed for the EDI-320 and a single inclinometer. The CROM received a positive rating for construct validity. When clinical acceptability is taken into account both the CROM and the single inclinometer can be considered appropriate instruments for measuring the active range of motion in patients with non-specific neck pain in daily practice. Reliability is the aspect most frequently evaluated. Agreement, validity and responsiveness are documented less frequently.

Indexed as

Arthrometry, ArticularHumansNeck PainRange of Motion, ArticularReproducibility of Results

Identifiers

PMID18427843
PMCPMC2443270
OpenAlexW1994681183

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.