Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18427833›Full record

ReviewPflugers Archiv : European journal of physiology2008

Cell models for studying renal physiology.

M Bens, A Vandewalle

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Pflugers Archiv : European journal of physiology, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 44 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Shiga toxin pathogenesis: kidney complications and renal failure.Current topics in microbiology and immunology · 2012
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. alphaENaC-mediated lithium absorption promotes nephrogenic diabetes insipidus.Journal of the American Society of Nephrology : JASN · 2011
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. A molecularly guided tour along the nephron.Pflugers Archiv : European journal of physiology · 2009
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

M BensINSERM U773, Centre de Recherche Biomédicale Bichat Beaujon, 75870 Cedex 18, Paris, France.
A Vandewalle
Inserm · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The development over the past 20 years of a variety of cultured renal tubule cell lines derived from different parts of the renal tubule has provided invaluable powerful cell systems for in vitro analyses of the various tubule segment-specific biochemical functions and ion transport processes. Immortalized cell lines have been established using different hybrid gene constructs, most of them carrying the immortalizing simian virus 40 large T antigen (Tag) gene. The development of transgenic mice carrying unregulated Tag, and of others in which the expression of Tag remains controlled, has made it possible to establish permanent cell lines derived from microdissected or immunoselected renal proximal, distal, and collecting duct tubules. This review summarizes the different strategies of cellular immortalization used and the most frequently used human, rabbit, rat, and mouse tubule cell lines. This review provides an overview of the use of immortalized mouse tubule cell lines for in vitro analyses of various tubule cell-specific functions and the regulation of ion transporters and membranous channels. The advantages of using primary cultures of isolated tubules dissected from physiopathological models of transgenic mice are also discussed.

Indexed as

AnimalsAntigens, Polyomavirus TransformingCell LineEpithelial CellsHumansKidneyKidney TubulesKidney Tubules, CollectingMiceMice, TransgenicModels, BiologicalRabbitsRatsAntigens, Polyomavirus Transforming

Identifiers

PMID18427833
OpenAlexW2122502386

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.