Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18427557›Full record

ReviewNature reviews. Genetics2008

Linkage disequilibrium--understanding the evolutionary past and mapping the medical future.

Montgomery Slatkin

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Nature reviews. Genetics, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 694 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
694citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
22.5field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

694 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 1,630 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Genetic Variation and Haplotype Structure ofLife (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

634 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Montgomery SlatkinDepartment of Integrative Biology, University of California, Berkeley, California 94720-3140, USA. slatkin@berkeley.edu
University of California, Berkeley · US

Funding

MODELS OF COMPLEX GENETIC SYSTEMSR01GM040282 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA BERKELEY · PI SLATKIN, MONTGOMERY WILSON · 1988 to 2017
$4.4M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM040282NIGMS NIH HHS R01-GM40282
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Linkage disequilibrium--the nonrandom association of alleles at different loci--is a sensitive indicator of the population genetic forces that structure a genome. Because of the explosive growth of methods for assessing genetic variation at a fine scale, evolutionary biologists and human geneticists are increasingly exploiting linkage disequilibrium in order to understand past evolutionary and demographic events, to map genes that are associated with quantitative characters and inherited diseases, and to understand the joint evolution of linked sets of genes. This article introduces linkage disequilibrium, reviews the population genetic processes that affect it and describes some of its uses. At present, linkage disequilibrium is used much more extensively in the study of humans than in non-humans, but that is changing as technological advances make extensive genomic studies feasible in other species.

Indexed as

Chromosome MappingEvolution, MolecularGenetics, MedicalLinkage DisequilibriumHumansPopulation

Identifiers

PMID18427557
PMCPMC5124487
OpenAlexW2091239497

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.