Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18425962›Full record

SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2008

Locomotor training for walking after spinal cord injury.

J Mehrholz, J Kugler, M Pohl

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Locomotor training for walking after spinal cord injury.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2012
    Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Exploiting telerobotics for sensorimotor rehabilitation: a locomotor embodiment.Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation · 2021
    Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. A survey of stakeholder perspectives on exoskeleton technology.Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation · 2014
    Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

J MehrholzKlinik Bavaria Kreischa, Department of Early Rehabilitation, An der Wolfsschlucht 1-2, Kreischa, Germany, 01731. jan.mehrholz@klinik-bavaria.de
J Kugler
M Pohl

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLocomotor training for walking is used in rehabilitation after spinal cord injury (SCI) and might help to improve walking.

objectivesTo assess the effects of locomotor training on improvement in walking for people with traumatic SCI. SEARCH STRATEGY: We searched the Cochrane Injuries Group Specialised Register (last searched June 2007); the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (The Cochrane Library 2007, Issue 2); MEDLINE (1966 to June 2007); EMBASE (1980 to June 2007); National Research Register (2007, Issue 2); CINAHL (1982 to June 2007); AMED (Allied and Complementary Medicine Database) (1985 to June 2007); SPORTDiscus (1949 to June 2007); PEDro (the Physiotherapy Evidence database) (searched June 2007); COMPENDEX (engineering databases) (1972 to June 2007); INSPEC (1969 to June 2007); and the National Research Register, Zetoc, and Current Controlled Trials research and trials registers. We also handsearched relevant conference proceedings, checked reference lists and contacted study authors in an effort to identify published, unpublished and ongoing trials. SELECTION CRITERIA: We included randomised controlled trials (RCT) that compared locomotor training to any other exercise provided with the goal of improving walking function after SCI or to a no-treatment control group. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two review authors independently selected trials for inclusion, assessed trial quality and extracted the data. The primary outcomes were the speed of walking and walking capacity at follow up. MAIN

resultsFour RCTs involving 222 patients were included in this review. Overall, the results were inconclusive. There was no statistically significant effect of locomotor training on walking function after SCI comparing bodyweight supported treadmill training with or without functional electrical stimulation or robotic-assisted locomotor training. AUTHORS'

conclusionsThere is insufficient evidence from RCTs to conclude that any one locomotor training strategy improves walking function more than another for people with SCI. Research in the form of large RCTs is needed to address specific questions about the type of locomotor training which might be most effective in improving walking function of people with SCI.

Indexed as

LocomotionWalkingHumansRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicSpinal Cord Injuries

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.