Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18425956›Full record

SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2008

Culture-specific programs for children and adults from minority groups who have asthma.

E J Bailey, S G Kruske, P S Morris, C J Cates, A B Chang

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers, 9 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed, 9 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 9 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Interventions for managing asthma in pregnancy.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2014
    Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Home-based educational interventions for children with asthma.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2011
    Pooled it
  9. Pooled it
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Trial
  15. Generational perspective on asthma self-management in the Bangladeshi and Pakistani community in the United Kingdom: A qualitative study.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2022
    Article
  16. Tailored patient therapeutic educational interventions: A patient-centred communication model.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2022
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

E J BaileyMenzies School of Health Research, Child Health Division, Darwin, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia. emily_bailey@health.qld.gov.au
S G Kruske
P S Morris
C J Cates
A B Chang
Menzies School of Health Research · AUCharles Darwin University · AURoyal Children's Hospital · AUSt George's, University of London · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPeople with asthma who come from minority groups have poorer asthma outcomes and more asthma related visits to Emergency Departments (ED). Various programmes are used to educate and empower people with asthma and these have previously been shown to improve certain asthma outcomes. Models of care for chronic diseases in minority groups usually include a focus of the cultural context of the individual and not just the symptoms of the disease. Therefore, questions about whether culturally specific asthma education programmes for people from minority groups are effective at improving asthma outcomes, are feasible and are cost-effective need to be answered.

objectivesTo determine whether culture-specific asthma programmes, in comparison to generic asthma education programmes or usual care, improve asthma related outcomes in children and adults with asthma who belong to minority groups. SEARCH STRATEGY: We searched the Cochrane Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), the Cochrane Airways Group Specialised Register, MEDLINE, EMBASE, review articles and reference lists of relevant articles. The latest search was performed in March 2007. SELECTION CRITERIA: All randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing the use of culture-specific asthma education programmes with generic asthma education programmes, or usual care, in adults or children from minority groups who suffer from asthma. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two review authors independently selected, extracted and assessed the data for inclusion. We contacted authors for further information if required. MAIN

resultsThree studies were eligible for inclusion in the review. A total of 396 patients, aged from 7 to 59 years were included in the meta-analysis of data. Use of a culture-specific programme was superior to generic programmes or usual care, in improving asthma quality of life scores in adults, pooled WMD 0.25 (95% CI 0.09 to 0.41) and asthma knowledge scores in children, WMD 3.30 (95% CI 1.07 to 5.53). There was no significant difference between groups in occurrence of asthma exacerbations, but the width of the confidence interval means that effects on exacerbation rates cannot be ruled out, rate ratio 0.93 (95% CI 0.80 to 1.10). AUTHORS'

conclusionsCulture-specific programmes for adults and children from minority groups with asthma, have been found to be more effective than generic programmes in improving some (Quality of Life and asthma knowledge) but not all asthma outcomes. This evidence is limited by the small number of included studies and the lack of reported outcomes. Further trials are required to answer this question conclusively.

Indexed as

CultureMinority GroupsAdolescentAdultAsthmaChildHumansMiddle AgedPatient Education as TopicRandomized Controlled Trials as Topic

Identifiers

PMID18425956
OpenAlexW4247434620

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.