SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2008
Ciclesonide versus placebo for chronic asthma in adults and children.
Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 8 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 8 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 18 citations in OpenAlex.
- Addition of long-acting beta2-agonists to inhaled corticosteroids for chronic asthma in children.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2015Pooled it
- Ciclesonide versus other inhaled corticosteroids for chronic asthma in children.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2013Pooled it
- Asthma in adults.BMJ clinical evidence · 2011Pooled it
- Addition of long-acting beta2-agonists to inhaled corticosteroids versus same dose inhaled corticosteroids for chronic asthma in adults and children.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2010Pooled it
- Addition of long-acting beta2-agonists to inhaled steroids versus higher dose inhaled steroids in adults and children with persistent asthma.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2010Pooled it
- Asthma in adults.BMJ clinical evidence · 2010Pooled it
- Addition of long-acting beta-agonists to inhaled corticosteroids for chronic asthma in children.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2009Pooled it
- Ciclesonide versus other inhaled steroids for chronic asthma in children and adults.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2008Pooled it
- Observational
- Guidelines for diagnosis and management of bronchial asthma: Joint ICS/NCCP (I) recommendations.Lung India : official organ of Indian Chest Society · 2015Article
- Profile of ciclesonide for the maintenance treatment of asthma.Therapeutics and clinical risk management · 2011Article
- Current recommendations for the treatment of mild asthma.Journal of asthma and allergy · 2010Article
- Severe asthma in children.The journal of allergy and clinical immunology. In practiceReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundInhaled corticosteroids are an integral part of asthma management, and act as an anti-inflammatory agent in the airways of the lung. These agents confer significant benefit in terms of symptom management and improvement in lung function, but may also cause harm in terms of local and systemic side-effects. Ciclesonide is a novel steroid that has efficient distribution and release properties that mean it can be taken once daily, making it potentially useful in ongoing asthma management.
objectivesTo assess the efficacy of inhaled ciclesonide in adults and children with chronic asthma. SEARCH STRATEGY: We searched the Cochrane Airways Group register of trials with pre-defined terms. Additional searches of CENTRAL and PubMed were undertaken. The literature searches for this review are current up to June 2007. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised parallel or crossover studies were eligible for the review. We included studies comparing ciclesonide with placebo, and we also included studies comparing ciclesonide at different doses. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two authors assessed studies for inclusion in the review, extracted data independently and checked each others' work. We contacted study investigators in order to obtain additional data. Extracted data were entered into RevMan 4.2 and analysed as fixed effect mean differences for continuous data, and fixed effect risk ratios for dichotomous data. MAIN
resultsEighteen trials (reporting 20 study comparisons) met the review entry criteria. We report findings from 18 group comparisons where data were available (6343 participants, of whom 1692 were children). Ciclesonide versus placebo: The short duration of the included studies means that there is a lack of data with respect to the impact of ciclesonide on asthma exacerbations. At doses of 100 mcg/d or less up to 400 mcg/d in mild to moderate asthma, ciclesonide improved lung function, asthma symptoms and rescue inhaler use, compared with placebo.Dose response outcomes: Comparisons of 100 versus 200 mcg/d, 100 versus 400 mcg/d and 400 versus 800 mcg/d did not yield significant differences in lung function outcomes. Adverse event data were not available in sufficient detail to permit assessment of the safety profile of this drug. AUTHORS'
conclusionsCiclesonide was more effective than placebo, in the short term, in improving lung function in patients with mild to moderate asthma previously treated with inhaled corticosteroids. There remain questions as to dose response, and the lack of data on the longer term impact on exacerbations and safety profile should be addressed in future studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.