Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18425526›Full record

ArticleHistochemistry and cell biology2008

Tracking of human cells in mice.

Wiebke Schormann, Friedrich J Hammersen, Marc Brulport, Matthias Hermes, Alexander Bauer, Claudia Rudolph, Markus Schug, Thomas Lehmann, Andreas Nussler, Hendrik Ungefroren and 9 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Histochemistry and cell biology, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 44 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Pre- and postmortem imaging of transplanted cells.International journal of nanomedicine · 2015
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors at 9 institutions in 2 countries.

Wiebke SchormannLeibniz Research Centre for Working Environment and Human Factors at the University of Dortmund (IfADo), Ardeystrasse 67, 44139, Dortmund, Germany. schormann@ifado.de
Friedrich J Hammersen
Marc Brulport
Matthias Hermes
Alexander Bauer
Claudia Rudolph
Markus Schug
Thomas Lehmann
Andreas Nussler
Hendrik Ungefroren
James Hutchinson
Fred Fändrich
Jörg Petersen
Karsten Wursthorn
Martin R Burda
Oliver Brüstle
Kannan Krishnamurthi
Marc von Mach
Jan G Hengstler
Leibniz Research Centre for Working Environment and Human Factors · DETU Dortmund University · DEUniversität Hamburg · DEUniversity of Lübeck · DEJohannes Gutenberg University Mainz · DELeipzig University · DELife & Brain (Germany) · DENational Environmental Engineering Research Institute · INTechnical University of Munich · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Tracking and tracing of transplanted cells in mice is required in many fields of research. Examples are transplantation of stem cells into organs of mice to study their differentiation capacity and injection of tumor cells to examine metastatic behavior. In the present study we tested the lipid dye CM-DiI and red fluorescent nanoparticles Qdot655 for their applicability in tagging and tracing of human cells in mice. Labeling of different cell types, including MCF-7 human breast cancer cells, human cord blood derived cells, human NeoHep cells and human hepatopancreatic precursor cells, is technically easy and did not compromise further cell culture. After transplantation of CM-DiI or Qdot655 marked cells, red fluorescent structures could be detected already in unprocessed paraffin slices of the studied organs, namely liver, lung, pancreas, kidney, spleen and bone marrow. Next, we examined whether the red fluorescent structures represent the transplanted human cells. For this purpose, we established an in situ hybridization (ISH) technique that allows clear-cut differentiation between human and murine nuclei, based on simultaneous hybridization with human alu and mouse major satellite (mms) probes. We observed a high degree of coincidence between CM-DiI-marked cells and alu positive nuclei. However, also some mms positive cells contained CM-DiI, suggesting phagocytosis of the transplanted CM-DiI-marked cells. The degree of such CM-DiI-positive mouse cells depended on the cell type and route of administration. From a technical point of view it was important that CM-DiI-positive structures in paraffin slices remained fluorescent also after ISH. In contrast, Qdot655 positive structures faded during further staining procedures. In conclusion, marking of cells with CM-DiI or Qdot655 prior to transplantation facilitates recovery of human cells, since a high fraction of positive structures in the host's tissue originate from the transplanted cells. However, CM-DiI or Qdot655 positive staining of individual cells in transplanted tissues is not sufficient to prove their human origin. Additional procedures, such as ISH with alu-probes, are essential, when characterizing individual cells.

Indexed as

Quantum DotsTransplantation, HeterologousAnimalsCarbocyaninesCell DifferentiationCell Line, TumorCell NucleusCord Blood Stem Cell TransplantationFluorescent DyesHumansIn Situ Hybridization, FluorescenceMaleMiceMice, Inbred NODMice, SCIDMicroscopy, FluorescenceCarbocyaninesCM-DiIFluorescent Dyes

Identifiers

PMID18425526
OpenAlexW2011734334

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.