ReviewCritical care nursing clinics of North America2008
The family history: reemergence of an established tool.
Review in Critical care nursing clinics of North America, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Hormones and thrombosis: the dark side of the moon.Blood transfusion = Trasfusione del sangue · 2024Review
- Application of whole exome sequencing in carrier screening for high-risk families without probands.Frontiers in genetics · 2024Article
- Adopted Individuals' Views on the Utility and Value of Expanded Carrier Screening.Journal of genetic counseling · 2018Article
- Genetic testing in congenital heart disease: A clinical approach.World journal of cardiology · 2016Review
- Multi-source development of an integrated model for family health history.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2015Article
- Characterizing the use and contents of free-text family history comments in the Electronic Health Record.AMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium · 2012Article
- The prospect of genome-guided preventive medicine: a need and opportunity for genetic counselors.Journal of genetic counseling · 2010Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
Abstract
Genetics has transformed the use of family history information and has led to the reemergence of the detailed genetic family history. It is critical that public and professional educational efforts to increase family history awareness and working knowledge are prioritized. Patient maintenance of the pedigree provides increased patient awareness and facilitates some of the limitations associated with conventional medical history ascertainment, ultimately improving health care and research. The increasing use of genetic screening promises to cultivate a paradigm shift in medical treatment emphasizing primary prevention and early intervention. Appreciation of the family history is necessary to make this important advance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.