Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18423762›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of urology2008

Surgical versus nonsurgical treatment of women with pelvic floor dysfunction: patient centered goals at 1 year.

Kathie L Hullfish, Viktor E Bovbjerg, Matthew J Gurka, William D Steers

Registry-linked trialAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of urology, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03410667 (A Patient-centered Approach to Urinary Incontinence and Quality of Life in Children and Adolescents With Spina Bifida), which is not on this map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03410667 naactive not recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2019, after this paper: background citation

A Patient-centered Approach to Urinary Incontinence and Quality of Life in Children and Adolescents With Spina Bifida

TypeinterventionalSponsorIndiana UniversityRan2019 to 2026Enrolled67ConditionsSpina Bifida, MyelomeningoceleArmsPhase One: Exploration, Phase Two: Creation, Phase Three: Reflection, Aim 3
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Observational
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Qualifying a quantitative approach to women's expectations of continence surgery.International urogynecology journal and pelvic floor dysfunction · 2009
    Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Kathie L HullfishDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Virginia Health System, Charlottesville, Virginia 22908, USA. khullfish@virginia.edu
Viktor E Bovbjerg
Matthew J Gurka
William D Steers

Funding

Patient-centered goals for pelvic floor dysfunctionR03HD042754 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA CHARLOTTESVILLE · PI HULLFISH, KATHIE L · 2003 to 2004
$152k
NICHD NIH HHS R03 HD042754
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeIn women with pelvic floor dysfunction we assessed the degree to which treatment (surgical vs nonsurgical) was associated with achievement of patient centered goals, satisfaction with care and quality of life. MATERIALS AND

methodsIn this prospective cohort study between September 2003 and December 2004 we recruited women during their first referral visit for pelvic floor dysfunction treatment at our outpatient Urogynecology Clinic. At the first visit women enumerated up to 5 personal treatment goals, and anchored each goal by anticipating best and worst possible outcomes. At 12-month followup women were asked to indicate the level of goal attainment (-2 worst outcome, +2 best outcome). At baseline and followup women completed short forms of the Incontinence Impact Questionnaire and Urogenital Distress Inventory (range 0 to 100, high scores indicating greater impact or distress). Patients indicated the level of treatment satisfaction on a 4-level ordinal scale.

resultsOf the 127 study participants with complete data 46 (36.2%) were treated surgically and 81 (63.8%) were treated nonsurgically. There were no major demographic differences between the 2 groups in terms of age, race, weight, prior pelvic floor dysfunction surgery and vaginal parity. The surgical group was more likely to have received a baseline diagnosis of pelvic organ prolapse (80% vs 60%, p = 0.0259) and be postmenopausal (89% vs 72%, p = 0.0261). There were no significant differences in the distribution of goal type (symptom relief, activity, self-image, general health) by treatment status (p = 0.1074). Using logistic regression to adjust for age and baseline diagnosis, surgically treated patients at 1 year were significantly more likely to report complete primary goal attainment (OR 4.42, p = 0.0154) and complete treatment satisfaction (OR 6.12, p = 0.0109). For all participants 1-year Incontinence Impact Questionnaire-7 and Urogenital Distress Inventory-6 scores were significantly correlated with primary goal attainment scores.

conclusionsIn this nonrandomized, prospective analysis surgically treated patients with pelvic floor dysfunction had higher 1-year self-described complete goal attainment and satisfaction scores compared with patients treated nonsurgically. Goal attainment scores correlated with disease specific quality of life. Patient centered outcomes should be incorporated in multicenter prospective research trials for pelvic floor disorders and in clinical practice to inform treatment plans.

Indexed as

Patient SatisfactionQuality of LifeFemaleFemale Urogenital DiseasesHumansMiddle AgedPelvic FloorProlapseProspective StudiesTime Factors

Identifiers

PMID18423762
PMCPMC2745736

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.